(edited by LUST.7241)
ToP 250 "Games Played" Limit Consideration
Sounds like a fair suggestion.
MMR probably gets more accurate the more games someone has played. So it should be 100 if not 200+ matches to be ranked.
Tbh, they will have to play at least a game every 3 days (so decay doesn’t hit them) to maintain themselves in the leaderboards. In the end, most of them will have played over 100 matches.
This is absolutely essential in my opinion!
Then lucky or unlucky streaks are weakened to some extent and the leader boards will be more of merit.
Tbh, they will have to play at least a game every 3 days (so decay doesn’t hit them) to maintain themselves in the leaderboards. In the end, most of them will have played over 100 matches.
this
Tbh, they will have to play at least a game every 3 days (so decay doesn’t hit them) to maintain themselves in the leaderboards. In the end, most of them will have played over 100 matches.
Season lasts like 2 month.
So at minimum, some one can play like only 30 games to remain on the leader board.
Tbh, they will have to play at least a game every 3 days (so decay doesn’t hit them) to maintain themselves in the leaderboards. In the end, most of them will have played over 100 matches.
Season lasts like 2 month.
So at minimum, some one can play like only 30 games to remain on the leader board.
Exactly. Given how high some people placed (despite what they should have been placed at)…It’s very possible to keep a 250 spot with limited games. Not to mention if someone does placements the very last day and places high…
Maybe there should be a decay every day
Maybe there should be a decay every day
Trust me, those people that did place high wouldn’t have issue with that since they pvp 24/7 anyway.
[Teef] guild :>
(edited by Cynz.9437)
I see someone in the top 8 after only 8 games. This is a BS system. Make people climb vs just adding people to their regular MMR levels.
Really no point to the season. Adjusting MMR is a slow process.