Guild Wars 2

All mmr ranges are grouped together.
Basically the highest and the lowest mmr person can be in the same team, as long as the 5 members combined from team A, have the same combined MMR as team B.

This just doesnt work well.

People who try to win, get matched with people who dont care and who ignore all objectives.

People really experienced can get teamed up with people who play their first game.

This isnt working well.

The mmr ranges in unranked shouldnt be this far apart.
If they are less far apart, similar minded people can be more together.
This makes the gameplay more enjoyable and gives less issues.

Also, why can it happen that your team enters a game with 3 of the same class?
Shouldnt that be easy to prevent? Like not more than 1 of the same class?
If people relog to the same class so be it, but at least dont let it happen at first entry.

The matchmaking in unranked is so bad right now, last night in one of my matches one of the people assigned to my side disconnected during the 90 seconds before the match started and never came back, and in spite of a 4v5 my team won (though it was a very close match). The other team was full of bad players, whereas I got to Legendaryx2 in season 1 (and while not ESL level am clearly not “new” or “bad”), and at least one person on my team is a stronger player than I am (I’ve grouped with him many times). I appreciate that we won, and I enjoyed the challenge, but that match-up was in no way shape or form “fair” or even close to fair if we were able to win without a player (even if he likely was our worst player).

I also got in a match with 4 mesmers + me (ele) … that was before new queuing patch. My guess is that they are trying to make the most battles with a single player per class, but since there would be always a remaining group, a match is punished (takes the bullet for the team) with the class in excess. … this is just a theory of mine tho.

Soul.9280:

The matchmaking in unranked is so bad right now, last night in one of my matches one of the people assigned to my side disconnected during the 90 seconds before the match started and never came back, and in spite of a 4v5 my team won (though it was a very close match). The other team was full of bad players, whereas I got to Legendaryx2 in season 1 (and while not ESL level am clearly not “new” or “bad”), and at least one person on my team is a stronger player than I am (I’ve grouped with him many times). I appreciate that we won, and I enjoyed the challenge, but that match-up was in no way shape or form “fair” or even close to fair if we were able to win without a player (even if he likely was our worst player).

That arrogance… What makes you think the other camp was bad (Skill wise obviously )?? Have you considered that they might have been trying new builds??? After the matchmaking tweaks, my first 10 games were a bit easy so I was able to win them all, but after those I was pretty much back to my spot; as I was able to fight against PZ and ez pz.

kuritsutian.2987:

I also got in a match with 4 mesmers + me (ele) … that was before new queuing patch. My guess is that they are trying to make the most battles with a single player per class, but since there would be always a remaining group, a match is punished (takes the bullet for the team) with the class in excess. … this is just a theory of mine tho.

We all had our share of those . Which is ok, however solely blaming Anet for it is wrong since most people can switch toon in game. Tbh, it less of an issue in high elo. To follow up on that,I believe the matchmaking tweaks kind of fix it a little bit; as I am seeing less of them. My games thus far have pretty much being diverse .