What about the 4v5s ?

What about the 4v5s ?

in PvP

Posted by: Julie Yann.5379

Julie Yann.5379

I just played 5 games in a rowin SoloQ with 4v5. Ok, I was on the side with 5 for 3 of those but it still kittening sucks not having any competition and I feel for those on the other team that have to fight through 10 minutes worth of ownage.

Here is a suggestion, keep a member from the over numbered team from respawning until equal numbers are met again.

Be careful what you wish for, Anet might just give it to you “HoT”
“…let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die;.”

(edited by Julie Yann.5379)

What about the 4v5s ?

in PvP

Posted by: Tala.7638

Tala.7638

Fairly good suggestion. I for 1 wouldnt mind getting logged into a match that was half way through. At least the numbers thing wouldnt be a factor in the match.

Talaysteria/Talas Cap/Talarenth
THE Mystic Plumbers [LUCK]
Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other.

What about the 4v5s ?

in PvP

Posted by: Caedmon.6798

Caedmon.6798

What if that particular player gets to play 3 matches while he randomly gets disabled to spawn in all 3 matches because the other team only has 4 people ?

What about the 4v5s ?

in PvP

Posted by: Julie Yann.5379

Julie Yann.5379

What if that particular player gets to play 3 matches while he randomly gets disabled to spawn in all 3 matches because the other team only has 4 people ?

You still get whatever reward your team has earn, whether it be win or lose. Sure it might suck to sit there and wait but at least the game remains competitive Sometimes 4v5 happens because of a dc in which cause your will only be sitting at spawn for a few minutes. Also it isn’t random, if your are to first to die after a 4v5 initiates then your are the one sitting one the bench.

Be careful what you wish for, Anet might just give it to you “HoT”
“…let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die;.”

What about the 4v5s ?

in PvP

Posted by: Caedmon.6798

Caedmon.6798

I do like the idea in general though,its better than it currently is by a mile.But i dont know how it would work out in practice,i think people that actually want to “play” instead of doing it for rewards only would get rather upset being disabled to play.

What about the 4v5s ?

in PvP

Posted by: Julie Yann.5379

Julie Yann.5379

I do like the idea in general though,its better than it currently is by a mile.But i dont know how it would work out in practice,i think people that actually want to “play” instead of doing it for rewards only would get rather upset being disabled to play.

I would rather sit on the bench a watch a close game than take part in 4v5. In fact, I do it fairly often already deespite getting yelled at by my team. Which is better? Having a game suck for 1 person sitting out or have it suck for 4 people fighting a pointless uphill battle. We PvP to compete, there is no competition in a 4v5.

Be careful what you wish for, Anet might just give it to you “HoT”
“…let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die;.”

(edited by Julie Yann.5379)

What about the 4v5s ?

in PvP

Posted by: joonasp.9217

joonasp.9217

Nothing has been done, nothing will be done. Stop asking about 4v5’s PvP is not Anet priority!

- JanS Löllykkä – www.jansguild.tumblr.com -