Why Not Vit For Valkyrie?
Is berserker amulet not ‘super strong’ in certain setups? What about soldiers? Isn’t being good for specific trait setups better than being useless in general?
Is berserker amulet not ‘super strong’ in certain setups? What about soldiers? Isn’t being good for specific trait setups better than being useless in general?
I think what he’s trying to say is, there’s no need for further homogenization when some classes can already do it with ease.
Giving Valks more health would just make certain classes that much stronger and all-rounded which is the kind of thing that creates “Healing Signet” threads.
http://www.youtube.com/user/ceimash
http://www.twitch.tv/ceimash
The real question is, why is there no Power/Precision/Toughness gear in pvp?
The real question is, why is there no Power/Precision/Toughness gear in pvp?
do you realy want warriors with max toughness , zerker crit chance and decent power? nty
The real question is, why is there no Power/Precision/Toughness gear in pvp?
I agree.
Given that the rabid amulet exists (condi dmg, precision, toughness) i believe there should be a power/prec/tough amulet to match it. I think it would bring more power builds into the meta. Right now you either go glass (zerker amulet) or run a pseudo bunker soldiers build that relies heavily on might stacks to do any decent damage.
I would also like to see a power/condi dmg/toughness amulet.
Bad Boy Teenager Club [BBTC]
twitch.tv/rarnark
I agree with Rarnark, having more options isn’t a bad thing. Using the thought process of “what about [insert class/build] with [insert new stat combination] would be OP” isn’t really fair because we already have unbalanced options to play with.
More customization would go along way and would open up more options for different play styles. It could also make the game feel less stagnant and make the meta-game more diverse.
Considering all of the amulets fit a certain stat budget, I assume balance shouldn’t be that much of an issue.
(edited by Forz.1725)