Why thieves shouldn't be nerfed

Why thieves shouldn't be nerfed

in PvP

Posted by: Rezz.8019

Rezz.8019

Ok so quite a few (mostly lower ranked) people here are suggesting that thief is too strong and needs a nerf. Mostly because of heartseeker 2222 spam. However, you have to keep in mind that thief is supposed to be similar to GW1 assassin profession. Which was basically instant kill with the combo that took 2 seconds. But as a tradeoff they were quite fragile, just like the thieves here. No one ever complained about the assassins in GW1.
If heartseeker and 22222 spam gets removed, thieves will be completely useless. They’re nothing but paper and they are supposed to kill the enemies easily. That’s just how the profession works.
So Anet please don’t nerf heartseeker, it will just completely remove thieves from pvp.

(edited by Moderator)

Why thieves shouldn't be nerfed

in PvP

Posted by: Hekmatyar.8725

Hekmatyar.8725

Wow.

Just wow o_o’

Nellmar/Arezzem

Why thieves shouldn't be nerfed

in PvP

Posted by: Archaon.6245

Archaon.6245

Wow.

Just wow o_o’

as i said in another post…please anet, don’t fix hs…i want my free points for facerolling hs spammers 10 times a match….without hb or hs spammers and so on it would be harder to get so much honor…..need 45k/rank, can’t lose them…. u.u

Why thieves shouldn't be nerfed

in PvP

Posted by: Frye.4608

Frye.4608

“they are supposed to kill the enemies easily. That’s just how the profession works.”

This point of view is so blatantly unreasonable that I hadn’t considered it before. In a sentence and a half you made me understand the reluctance of thieves to face up to reality.

Why thieves shouldn't be nerfed

in PvP

Posted by: Moderator.3964

Moderator.3964

Hello,

as we have created a special thread in order to enable you to voice your opinions on thief gameplay, we would like you to focus your feedback on this thread in order to enable us to gather your feedback efficiently.

The thread I’m talking about is found here.

Therefore this thread is hereby closed.

Thanks for your understanding.