advancing in ranked should be based on score
No thank you, sometimes the best option to win a game is not to get personal score.
Otherwise, everyone will cap home for the points. No one would defend. Just bad incentives all round.
Depends on how points are given really.
No thank you, sometimes the best option to win a game is not to get personal score.
Otherwise, everyone will cap home for the points. No one would defend. Just bad incentives all round.
if people just stood at home they would never get enough points to get a pip
No thank you, sometimes the best option to win a game is not to get personal score.
Otherwise, everyone will cap home for the points. No one would defend. Just bad incentives all round.
if people just stood at home they would never get enough points to get a pip
I think you misunderstand me, and your point goes towards why I don’t think points should be used for pips.
At the start if the match, the usual split involves one person heading for home. If people cared about points, then they would 5 cap home for the points. People would also refuse to leave points until they were capped, despite that only one person needs to be on the point.
Also, defending is usually vital to winning a match. But it is worth comparatively fewer points than capping or fighting on a contested point.
I feel like your proposed system would end up being a self fulfilling prophecy: players would focus on individual points, rather than winning the match, thus necessitating the need for individual points. I’d rather just keep it to winning the match.
You must be new if you think the scoring system in this game matters.