(edited by Kitt.2567)
rewards soloQ people, just like ToL.
All of those tPvPers who got Eternity via tPvP.
Very nice troll post A++
All of those tPvPers who got Eternity via tPvP.
Very nice troll post A++
Oh man, I can’t deny Apex Prime was top group in Tpvp zone even before the start of ToL? or you deny it?
(edited by Kitt.2567)
so, dumb luck should be rewarded the same as the as combined effort of 5 players ? prob not
also…
- 200 games is too low
- win or lose, 1 game per week is all it takes to stay top 100 thanks to the way decay works
- no one got eternity :/
1. 200 game is low, i agree, then maybe 400 game then. It is definitely upto ANET’s decision though. But we must allow some genius people, who has relatively very low experience but does almost same quality as real top100, to be top100. (but not people like 8 win 4 loss so top1. it is fully luck in total) so maybe bracket between 200~400 games in total will fairly work correctly to distinguish good players between people who won by full of luck and people who are really skilled.
2. If that happens, dont worry, If 1 came into top100, another 1 will be removed from top100, so no problem GG.
3. I said the amount, quantity, quality of reward to soloQ pvper isn’t problem, but rewarding to soloQ pvper is important.
so, dumb luck should be rewarded the same as the as combined effort of 5 players ? prob not
also…
- 200 games is too low
- win or lose, 1 game per week is all it takes to stay top 100 thanks to the way decay works
- no one got eternity :/
(edited by Kitt.2567)
Have to say, as someone who has solo queued regularly since before it was a separate thing, it’s a pretty toxic environment for the community. How many friends have you guys made from solo q?
Players should be encouraged to team queue in a casual but rewarding way. That would be the healthiest thing for this game IMO.
Phaatonn, London UK
(edited by Phaeton.9582)