2nd and 3rd against 1st

2nd and 3rd against 1st

in WvW

Posted by: Pain.3756

Pain.3756

I apologize if this has been discussed before but a quick search did not return any results.

All too often I do not see 2nd and 3rd place ganging up on 1st place. In theory 1st place would always be battling 2nd and 3rd. In my tier(s) I rarely see that as a consistent strategy. Of course you can find it happening a 4 hour stretch here or a 4 hour stretch but it is not a general rule.

Any thoughts?

-g

2nd and 3rd against 1st

in WvW

Posted by: Ross Biddle.2367

Ross Biddle.2367

It has been discussed, a lot.

The trouble is the game is not designed for that. People play to win. People naturally take the path of least resistance.

2nd and 3rd against 1st

in WvW

Posted by: Jeknar.6184

Jeknar.6184

It has been discussed, a lot.

The trouble is the game is not designed for that. People play to win. People naturally take the path of least resistance.

In other words it’s 1st and 2nd against 3rd.

Kawagima / Kelvena Riverstream / Calamis Fatima / Hanna Flintlocke
WvW Rank 3800 (Platinum Veteran) – PvP Rank 69 (Shark) – 25,9k Achievment Points
Mërcenaries [Sold] – Ferguson’s Crossing

2nd and 3rd against 1st

in WvW

Posted by: Kinglette.4906

Kinglette.4906

most tiers first goes after both teams, second and third cannibalize each other to not come last.

80 Guardian, 80 Warrior, 80 Thief
[AVTR] FA