Guild Wars 2

Hello,

ANET needs to do something and take a stance on servers having the possibility of facing 2 other servers of the same language.

A perfect example is Blacktide vs Vizunah (FR) vs Arborstone (FR).

We, Blacktide, have been dealing with some sort of alliance forever.

Whenever one of the french server recognizes that winning is not possible it will ally with the other french world.

As i am writing this, Blacktide is currently no1 in the scoreboard, Vizunah 2nd and Arborstone 3rd.

Vizunah is putting alot of pressure on us because we are not able to hold anything, whatever we cap, Vizunah recaps with the help or Arborstone.

We went to their world to do some damage control, we tried to cap out first supply camp, the closest to our base, Arborstone ganked us, killed us, and left the supply camp blue.

We understand strategies are strategies, but this is just wrong and ANET either needs to start punishing servers that do this, or make it impossible for server A to face server B and C of the same laguage localization.

With kind regards,

Commander HERO.

It’s like people can’t understand the INTENTION of having a 1v1v1 is so that the top server has to face two others, potentially ganging up on you because you know, you are on top.

Boggles the mind.

ykyk.2740:

It’s like people can’t understand the INTENTION of having a 1v1v1 is so that the top server has to face two others, potentially ganging up on you because you know, you are on top.

Boggles the mind.

Why would the 3rd place server gang up on the 1st place server? Wouldn’t it make sense for the 3rd place to focus on the 2nd place so that they can move up? 3rd place gains nothing by focusing on the 1st place

I’m sorry, i guess you missed the part they are both french, and Arborstone being out of the race for 1st, has decided to ally with the others.

They aren’t killing eachother, they are just killing us.

If you can’t win, what can you gain by attacking the first?

Nothing, because 2nd will rise to 1st, 1st will drop to 2nd and 3rd will be even further away from the 2nd place.

Once again, i’m not arguing about what strategies they make, i’m arguing because we are clearly facing a french alliance, which are not playing fair, when Arborstone sole objective is to kill Blacktide and not cap anything, making sure it remains for the Vizunah, something has to be done.

Arborstone and VS are clearly allied… http://mos.millenium.org/matchups
You should probably spend more time on the battlefield to really see what’s going on

ykyk.2740:

It’s like people can’t understand the INTENTION of having a 1v1v1 is so that the top server has to face two others, potentially ganging up on you because you know, you are on top.

Boggles the mind.

Agree

1 vs 2 is expected.
Both French Servers teamed to face the invading forces and then they will have a civil war! More realistic than that it can’t be!
^^

…I don’t see the problem, alliance or not.

You are utterly wrong and this thread is plain silly. Arbor and VS harbor a ton of hatred for each other and they focus every bit as much on each other as they do us, despite us being #1 (and being the logical target).

Grow a spine.

Zerg from poland Blacktide are crying. U make my day

I’m sorry but you are not correct.

Ganking against the highest ranked in the scoreboard is wrong, but expected, the issue here is that we get to face 2 french worlds, are for the sake of keeping things leveled, this should not be possible.

It screams corruption, and dishonesty.

Also as i am playing at the moment another clear alliance moment just happened.

We tried to take Redvale Refuge, which is from Vizunah, a swarm of Arborstone came, killed us and left, Redvale Refuge still remains to Vizunah.

Now tell me, is this how it’s intended to be done?

Or am i missing some sort of PvP hindsight?

Due to the thread not really discussing, but accusing others it is closed before it can derail to hatespeech etc.. However your suggestion has been noted and will be forwarded to the respective teams.

Thanks for your understanding.