Coverage Wars

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Gudradain.3892

Gudradain.3892

Still pretty much in development but if you want to see the strength of each server per timezone, now you can :

http://coveragewars2.com

Attachments:

Afala – Ehmry Bay

(edited by Gudradain.3892)

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Gudradain.3892

Gudradain.3892

Website is back up and hopefully for good now

Afala – Ehmry Bay

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Orochimaru.4730

Orochimaru.4730

OK, but where are all the EU servers?

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Gudradain.3892

Gudradain.3892

OK, but where are all the EU servers?

Will be added later, when the site get out of alpha.

Afala – Ehmry Bay

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Dr Gonzo.6259

Dr Gonzo.6259

Nice one Afala, this is very informational

(edited by Dr Gonzo.6259)

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Coyote.7031

Coyote.7031

According to this, I should bandwagon onto CD because they have coverage at all times, thus people to play with on my wonky schedule. And are top of their tier.

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Gudradain.3892

Gudradain.3892

Well, actually CD will probably move up next week so they might become the bottom of their new tier.

Afala – Ehmry Bay

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Coyote.7031

Coyote.7031

Well, actually CD will probably move up next week so they might become the bottom of their new tier.

If their are people that actually play during the day instead of like 5 people… that be cool. But grass is always greener on the other side.

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Dhemize.8649

Dhemize.8649

Wow YB was the only server that never went into red at any time. I was hoping to see number of players though because that would very interesting. We just need Anet to hand over that info so we can all place blame on each other with an accurate chart.

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Otokomae.9356

Otokomae.9356

Wow YB was the only server that never went into red at any time. I was hoping to see number of players though because that would very interesting. We just need Anet to hand over that info so we can all place blame on each other with an accurate chart.

?

The chart above shows Yak’s Bend going Red in 6 Timezones. Looks like Crystal Desert and Borlis Pass are the only servers with 24/7 coverage, in comparison to the rest of their current Tiers.

Bakuon/Bakuon Thief [MAS]/ ex-[ATac]

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Kamara.4187

Kamara.4187

Thank you…my favorite enemy and /salute from Anvil Rock

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Fuzzion.2504

Fuzzion.2504

good work. keep it up

Fuzzionx [SF]
Guest member of [LOVE]
JQ official Prime Minister

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Liston.9708

Liston.9708

Wow YB was the only server that never went into red at any time. I was hoping to see number of players though because that would very interesting. We just need Anet to hand over that info so we can all place blame on each other with an accurate chart.

?

The chart above shows Yak’s Bend going Red in 6 Timezones. Looks like Crystal Desert and Borlis Pass are the only servers with 24/7 coverage, in comparison to the rest of their current Tiers.

Seems this is for current 24 hr period versus historical look over time? Those values may change drastically weekend versus weekday etc…..

YB→YB→YB→YB→YB→YB→YB→most likely YB

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Gudradain.3892

Gudradain.3892

Wow YB was the only server that never went into red at any time. I was hoping to see number of players though because that would very interesting. We just need Anet to hand over that info so we can all place blame on each other with an accurate chart.

?

The chart above shows Yak’s Bend going Red in 6 Timezones. Looks like Crystal Desert and Borlis Pass are the only servers with 24/7 coverage, in comparison to the rest of their current Tiers.

Seems this is for current 24 hr period versus historical look over time? Those values may change drastically weekend versus weekday etc…..

The ratings that you see are for the current week in the specific time periods.

For example, the ratings for 1 to 4 UTC are calculated by :

1. Getting the ratings for 1 to 4 UTC of the previous week
2. Then for every day in the week, combine the score that each server gain between 1 to 4 UTC
3. With the score calculated in #2, calculate the ratings for this week.
4. At reset (on friday), the rating for the week that just ended are permanently stored in the database

So, to answer your question, it is an historical look over time. It will take a few weeks for the ratings to stabilize and indicate the true strength of each server but once it does, it will indicate for each timezone the “true” strength of each server. It’s as reliable as the “true” strength that Anet gives us over there https://leaderboards.guildwars2.com/en/na/wvw

Afala – Ehmry Bay

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: SkyShroud.2865

SkyShroud.2865

yea….

the numbers are quite misleading…
it is only true if the data consist of the same severs for several weeks
just like neural network which require lots of data to be accurate

i suggest putting “number of weeks” for that identical match up to give a better idea of the coverage between servers

Founder & Leader of Equinox Solstice [TIME], a Singapore-Based International Guild
Henge of Denravi Server
www.gw2time.com

(edited by SkyShroud.2865)

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Gudradain.3892

Gudradain.3892

yea….

the numbers are quite misleading…
it is only true if the data consist of the same severs for several weeks
just like neural network which require lots of data to be accurate

i suggest putting “number of weeks” for that identical match up to give a better idea of the coverage between servers

Nope they are not misleading.

Glicko2 is meant to give you the relative strength of every opponents. For example, if server A has a rating of 2000 and server B has a rating of 1500, you know that server A is stronger than server B even if they have never faced each other. It’s like that that it works in chess 2. You don’t need to face the world ranked player that has 2500 glicko rating to know that he will wipe your kitten in a competition.

As I said before, these numbers work as well as the official ratings and really represent the strength of each server in each timezone the way that Arena Net calculate them.

Afala – Ehmry Bay

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: SkyShroud.2865

SkyShroud.2865

for example,

a lower tier server raise up to a higher tier, they happen to be capable of competing in that tier but not winning it or coming as 2nd. they will still gain glicko, no doubt.

however, looking at how your site present the data, it will show that server positive gain in all timezone, thus giving an impression that they have a full coverage comparing to other servers of the same tier even though it is just glicko gained compared to the server they replaced. do you get what i mean?

Founder & Leader of Equinox Solstice [TIME], a Singapore-Based International Guild
Henge of Denravi Server
www.gw2time.com

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Gudradain.3892

Gudradain.3892

Ah ok, but don’t just look at the gain. You need to look at the number next to it too that represent the current rating.

By clicking on the rows, you can see the average PPT in each timezone. The average PPT is the best indication of who is winning each timezone in the current matchup. While the rating is the best indication we can get on your server compared to the 24 others.

Afala – Ehmry Bay

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Gudradain.3892

Gudradain.3892

The website just got updated. It now has a menu, a logo and a brand new section : predicted match up.

Check it out!

http://coveragewars2.com/matchup.php?world=1010

Afala – Ehmry Bay

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Liston.9708

Liston.9708

Wow YB was the only server that never went into red at any time. I was hoping to see number of players though because that would very interesting. We just need Anet to hand over that info so we can all place blame on each other with an accurate chart.

?

The chart above shows Yak’s Bend going Red in 6 Timezones. Looks like Crystal Desert and Borlis Pass are the only servers with 24/7 coverage, in comparison to the rest of their current Tiers.

Seems this is for current 24 hr period versus historical look over time? Those values may change drastically weekend versus weekday etc…..

The ratings that you see are for the current week in the specific time periods.

For example, the ratings for 1 to 4 UTC are calculated by :

1. Getting the ratings for 1 to 4 UTC of the previous week
2. Then for every day in the week, combine the score that each server gain between 1 to 4 UTC
3. With the score calculated in #2, calculate the ratings for this week.
4. At reset (on friday), the rating for the week that just ended are permanently stored in the database

So, to answer your question, it is an historical look over time. It will take a few weeks for the ratings to stabilize and indicate the true strength of each server but once it does, it will indicate for each timezone the “true” strength of each server. It’s as reliable as the “true” strength that Anet gives us over there https://leaderboards.guildwars2.com/en/na/wvw

Thanks for the explanation. this makes sense on why someone saw all green and another not so much. They looked at different times and last week was screwy with holiday days thur/fri (and of course sat) for many here in the U.S.

YB→YB→YB→YB→YB→YB→YB→most likely YB

Coverage Wars

in WvW

Posted by: Gudradain.3892

Gudradain.3892

The webiste now feature 2 new sections

1. Rank by timezone
2. Average PPT by timezone

Attachments:

Afala – Ehmry Bay