Guild Wars 2

It’s early days yet but FR are pulling ahead with a good lead already.
If this continues it’s going to end up the same as every other match where one side takes an early lead with no way to turn it around.

If Gandara and Gunnar’s can work together, we can even the match up again.

I suggest we defend our own lands and only attack blue objectives (FR) until such a point that the match even’s up again.

Gunnars could concentrate on Durios and Umberglade while Gandara take Quentin and Danelon.

I’m probably asking for too much but this is the way ANet thought it would play out, so until WvWvW changes for the better, why not give it a go?

If I can get some response in here from Gunnar’s, I’ll try to spread the word on Gandara.

Good luck either way.

Hello Jacklo,
Let’s refrain from banding up for the moment.
Gunnar’s fights for first place, even if we are third.
but our tactics are basicly attacking anything that we could possibly take
When things really get out of control, then it might be a good idea to consider a unwritten agreement to attack the leader. [On any server] then again we always attack the strongest world because we don’t like winners!
So as soon as we from gunnard’s win we’ll attack ourselves.

I don’t know if somebody from Gunnard’s contacted you, but i doubt anyone from our world will agree to a alliance.

Best of luck for now.

Merlin.

NB: feel free to contact me in case of gameabuse hacks exploits etc..

We are Gunnars.. We Hold..

Popped this on our forums [SN] Gandara

I do think its silly that once someone has such a lead they’ve won for the week and it demoralises the servers they’re up against who quite until the following week, can’t be fun for them but there’s sooooooooo many on FR there’s no chance that either server will catch up alone.

Not sure why there’s no Parle point on a map where losing servers can’t meet up for a little truce agreement.

I just think there should be an option for servers to work together for a limited period of time, this being outnumbered gubbins is bloody annoying especially when you’re on a server with a healthy bunch of guilds like to play WvWvW and put up a good fight.

Although both servers aren’t out of the running yet :P

I havn’t seen the scores yet, and i am not able to play on the reset weekends, because of work. But generally what’s written above is the standards Gunnars goes by, the stubborn bunch.

I will drop this link and let all the guilds on mumble decide for themself what they want to do.

Hi Merlin,
Make no mistake, if you’re red you’re dead… but I think we could play this wisely and just avoid each other until things are under control and no-one s running away with an easy lead..

FR will play all night, we both know that. There’s no point letting ego’s get in the way of trying to have more fun for the rest of the week.

Anyway I respect whatever decisions Gunnar’s make. All the best.

Thanks Tortun as well, wise words.

Jacklo.4230

If Gandara and Gunnar’s can work together…

No

All Jacklo’s saying is that Gandara and Gunnar’s Hold both have clear objectives on each map which we should be pursuing. In the case of EB, that’s our own section and the blue positions nearest us. If we start focusing on Anza’s or GH starts going after WC and RQ then we open ourselves up to an easy flank by FR.

On each of the borderlands, we should be pursuing natural objectives: that means moving north on the FR map. This isn’t about a truce, which is unnecessary, this is about not exposing ourselves as easy prey to the FR hordes.

Well we made some progress until a couple hours ago, then Gunnar’s started attacking Gandara lowlands, we retaliated and now FR are back in Stonemist.
Considering FR will be on day and night, so far we’re making it easy for them.

Personally I’d rather see Gandara OR Gunnar’s take this before FR walk away with another easy win.

Well I guess it is about time for some alliance. FR currently dominates about 80-90% of the map and steamrolls everything just with numbers.