Golems need blueprint ownership.
Agree happened to me everytime. Some noob people gets golem and rush them to zerg thinking they are invulnerable. Not knowing the value of those golems especially Omegas.
Isle of Janthir [2012-2017] → Fort Aspenwood [2017-Present]
Power Ranger
(edited by Tukmolytes.3467)
Agreed. Golems (like all the other siege) should have ownership set to the one who dropped the build site. I do not understand why they are the only ‘free-for-all’ siege without ownership.
Fojja – Vyxxi – Nymmra – Mymmra – Champion of Dwayna .. and more
Highly Over Powered Explorers [HOPE] – Desolation EU
perhaps also a tempoary lock feature so if the owner disappear(to another tower) people can’t just quickly run off with them
Why golems don’t have blueprint ownership is beyond me too.
Gandara
I agree. Why this isn’t already in game, I have no idea.
I think it would be ideal to have a permission list for them, to allow guildies, party members, general people to use them or not to use them. That way if one person provides multiple golems you don’t have to worry about people getting them killed by wolves or zergs as tends to happen.
So do engineer Mortars. When I first unlocked that skill long ago I wanted to test it out. Someone took it right as I set it down and didn’t get off.
I had to wait an extra 2 minutes or whatever the cooldown is to realize how god awful that skill is.
totally agree. golem suicides happen wayyyy too often.i think guild golems shold be able to be taken back by any of the guild members
[AVTR]
Isle of Kickaspenwood
actually no i disagree i got a couple out of chests. i prefer not to use them so when a commander wishes to use them i pop them up and prefer if someone else uses it. if they do implement this idea have a box pop up asking me if another can use it or not.
Considering how powerful golems are, and their resulting cost both in supply & badges / gold, it makes perfect sense that the owner should be able to take it over like all other siege.
actually no i disagree i got a couple out of chests. i prefer not to use them so when a commander wishes to use them i pop them up and prefer if someone else uses it. if they do implement this idea have a box pop up asking me if another can use it or not.
Well you can still pass the blueprint to commander. But the ownership should belong to the person who activate the build site.
[DKJ] – Jade Quarry
actually no i disagree i got a couple out of chests. i prefer not to use them so when a commander wishes to use them i pop them up and prefer if someone else uses it. if they do implement this idea have a box pop up asking me if another can use it or not.
Well you can still pass the blueprint to commander. But the ownership should belong to the person who activate the build site.
didnt know we could do that actually looked this up after you posted then a while gave some commander love. with 15 ac 4 trech and a bunch of other stuff. im glad we can give them away cuase i [personally hate using the stuff and wish them to go to the cause