Please differentiate between camps and keeps

Please differentiate between camps and keeps

in WvW

Posted by: Reanne.5462

Reanne.5462

I wish, I wish…. I could claim a camp for the 20 supply, without screwing over my guild’ees who just took a keep and claimed it. Please anet make it possible to claim 1 of each type, camp, tower, keep. Not just 1 of any on the whole map.

Our guild has a ton of war room buffs, but what good are they if only 10 people out of a 500 person guild can benefit from them. I’m trying to say.

We are in more than one place at once, working on different aspects of the WvW.

It would be nice to be able to claim a camp without tearing down a keep.

Please differentiate between camps and keeps

in WvW

Posted by: FogLeg.9354

FogLeg.9354

Sounds ok.

I suspect the restriction for one claim per map is there so more guilds would work on their upgrades. Which means more PvE in HoT maps.

Please differentiate between camps and keeps

in WvW

Posted by: Radian.2478

Radian.2478

It was designed this way to allow more guilds to be able to participate with guild claiming. If you can claim a keep, camp, and tower at the same time then two guilds can claim your entire EBG side. You can already claim 4 things at once (one for each map).

Please differentiate between camps and keeps

in WvW

Posted by: Svarty.8019

Svarty.8019

No thanks. Let smaller guilds have their place.

Nobody at Anet loves WvW like Grouch loved PvP. That’s what we need, a WvW Grouch, but taller.

Please differentiate between camps and keeps

in WvW

Posted by: Sinbold.8723

Sinbold.8723

It was designed this way to allow more guilds to be able to participate with guild claiming. If you can claim a keep, camp, and tower at the same time then two guilds can claim your entire EBG side. You can already claim 4 things at once (one for each map).

This is really only valid for tiers 1 and 2, where there are many large guilds playing WvW. There are several tiers beneath those that do not have that population nor the number of guilds.

I fully support the original post’s suggestion.