Proactive WWW co operation. Is your server co operating to take down the king?

Proactive WWW co operation. Is your server co operating to take down the king?

in WvW

Posted by: Firefly.4165

Firefly.4165

Just thought I’d put it out there instead of looking like a troll on the numerous silly threads on fixing something that is not broken… that being the problem of being squished by the leading server.

If your server is co operating with another server to take down Goliath… Please do share. I would be curious to see how many servers are taking advantage of this hidden weapon of mass destruction.

Proactive WWW co operation. Is your server co operating to take down the king?

in WvW

Posted by: Dethwar.1768

Dethwar.1768

IoJ and SoS have employed this strategy against ET…however it was employed way too late allowing ET to basically secure 3 orbs within keeps with upgrades all the way up to spawn points. I have a feeling next time IoJ and SoS are in same bracket they will have learned their lesson.

But yeah, this strategy has been deployed in the second tier matchup and it works. SoS and IoJ only have enough NA Prime Time presence to basically play on one borderland – ET dominates all other 3 borderlands with huge amount of number inbalance. Yesterday for example, all of the forces from IoJ and SoS were in the SoS borderlands. When we first arrived the whole map was green – ET +695, IoJ +0, and SoS +0. But since we doubled teamed ET – Red got their Garrison back and IoJ got the two southern towers plus all the supply camps. We rallied all the forces to try and get back the keeps but they had way too much siege equipment which had built up to max upgrades over a number of days.

So good fighting on one night of 2 v 1 – too bad we only had enough NA Prime population to play in one borderland basically and ET had 4 days time of unbothered keep/tower upgrades and siege built up.