(edited by Moderator)
The main topic about NA players on Eu servers
They are good and we want more of them!
BUT I don’t want my server to be treated like their Afghanistan. Once you come, we’d like you to stay even after the initial victory.
Remember when people on the forums were complaining about Oceanic presence on NA servers? Well, now you share our pain.
I disagree with it though, I wish people would just have the integrity to stick to their region.
let’s hope there will be IP restriction soon.
let’s hope there will be IP restriction soon.
or better yet ALL servers both NA and EU in one big ladder
In my personal opinion it is something wrong with this system, from one side we have a NA and EU ladder but from other hand there is no restriction for the players to transfer across NA and EU regions and participation in WvW .
And we don’t have a clear statement from Anet about this problem, ( or there is not a problem at all from the Anet point of view ).
PS what is a point to have EU servers, and EU competition if results will be dependent form the amount NA players on "EU"servers ???
Its like US Congress will be elected by citizens of “People’s Republic of China”
This just doesn’t seems right ….
(edited by Moderator)
There is a statement about this and it’s pretty old (August 16, 2012).
By default, we display the worlds that are hosted in your regional data center, but you will be able to select a home world from either region at this time. So, for example, if you are a European player who prefers to play on the North American worlds, you’re free to do so.
Source: https://www.guildwars2.com/en/news/a-world-of-choice-the-regions-of-guild-wars-2/
French CM say in basic, “We don’t care about the tagged serv if you want having competition switch in a EU serv”… So well played to Deso and Ruins
And before moderate me.., plz look the french cm answer…
Jade Quarry
(edited by Wothan.4673)
let’s hope there will be IP restriction soon.
There won’t be and there shouldn’t be.
I’m fully against it. They make our most competitive server full in no time, giving the actual EU players almost no interesting wvw server choice.
This problem would be a lot smaller if there didn’t exist french/german/spanish servers. I agree it’s usefull they exist, but now all the americans go to English (international) servers on EU, wich there are only a handfull of them, if we only count the serious wvw contenders. Either increase capacity of any international server (English), or stop this US/EU hopping.
No excuse anymore for not giving ‘hide mounts’-option
No thanks to unidentified weapons.
Someday, I may play on an EU server. And if I do, I’ll make a guild called Real American Hero [JOE]
Don’t take that dream away from me, even if it never happens.
Darxio – Thief Commander
That’s awesome, Darxio.
I beleive there should just be one ladder, and it should’ve been there from the start.
IP restrictions would be horrible for many worldwide communities, and honestly, i feel that is more important that “oh no, they’re messing up our ladder”
On top of that, many people like talking to and meeting people from all over the world, and they shouldnt get restricted the way that some other companies do.
They are good and we want more of them!
BUT I don’t want my server to be treated like their Afghanistan. Once you come, we’d like you to stay even after the initial victory.
Your absurd statement taken aside and it truly is…
Yes the people moving should be moving to a better home not the next stadium…
Yes they should stay but that would have required them to have moved there for the right reason first.
By the way who exactly does Afghanistan belong to if the occupying country never leaves? I think they call that conquering…
Or babysitting, depends on the view point ^^
Or babysitting, depends on the view point ^^
if a foreign countries military is allowing you to exist in the way you like you can look at it as an “occupation” but the simple truth in my mind is that they are in control. On paper it might look like you still have a country but in reality your are a conquered people.
babysitting depending on the context of the exact usage in this case is nothing more than semantics. If you look at it that way how many Countries is the USA babysitting right now? Do they need a spanking? Should they go to bed without dinner?
Well it does depend on the reason why those foreign armies stay. If they are not welcomed anymore, then it does feel like a conquest. If they are still needed then it is a babysitting.
You can ask whether a country unable to exist without foreign help should exist to begin with sure, but that’s quite a different topic. On this matter we went a bit off topic there… I suppose this was not about US foreign policy :/
The Afghanistan metaphor was bad to begin with…
Unless you think deso was a terrorist serv that needed a good spanking.
I know I did. Still do
Watching Mos.millenium it seams that almighty Deso incl. Ruin is really getting stomped by BT, we will see. Maybe this is a sign for some NA-players that EU is not only PvD, and that they will have more fun in their own ladder? We will see, too.
What I’m afraid of is that in the next weeks, the first in T2 will change places with the third T1. That would be VZ and ER in the moment. I`m playing on ER, I think as a languagetagged Server it`s no shame to say that we can`t handle 24\7. So, if anyone from ER had anytime the ambition running nacked with a Level one-Char in Wvw – now it`s the time!
Just kidding. My twink is 10
(edited by Rieshaus.7486)
Don’t count your chickens before they are hatched. There is a whole week of WvW ahead of us, and without the advantage awarded by night-capping, desolation doesn’t seem to be doing so well.
Blacktide always comes out strong the first night and day of the matchup (except the first time in T2, against ER and FSP), it’s all about seeing if we can keep it up, we haven’t always managed