WVW is not a challenge
Is anyone gonna reply to this?
The topic has been brought up a million times, that’s why no one is responding, I guess you are new to the forums so maybe just read some older threads and you will see for yourself.
Hello. I’m on the Ring of Fire server, and we’ve been incredibly outnumbered by enemy servers. What I’ve realized is, if you have enough players, WVW is not a challenge and thereby not fair on other players.
Think about it, Ring of Fire cannot do anything because they’re allowed to be incredibly outnumbered. This makes it easier to beat than an ant. You see, this shouldn’t be WVW. There should be some restrictions, or some power boosts if your outnumbered. No limit on how many players you can have means you or the enemy can be completely overpowered. I just feel that the servers should be evenly matched in this WVW.
sadly Anet are too smart to just give some lame kitten boosts when outnumbered. We can take zergs headon with the exp, karma, wxp, w/e boosts lol
Playing outnumbered do not means tyo loose….. thats the challange!
Playing outnumbered do not means tyo loose….. thats the challange!
I always wanted to see the miracle when 10 man zerg can successfully defend the only tower they just flipped on the whole map against two 50 man zergs who are just too lazy to fight each other.
Playing outnumbered do not means tyo loose….. thats the challange!
I always wanted to see the miracle when 10 man zerg can successfully defend the only tower they just flipped on the whole map against two 50 man zergs who are just too lazy to fight each other.
Called, 10 men on a ton of superior siege.
OP must be new here. Welcome to Coverage Wars 2.
I feel your pain man, I really do. I love WvW, but I hate it more for how flawed it can be.
@OP:
Stop caring about the overall server score and go look for fights. Regardless of whether an entire server is outnumbered, you can still find fights during your time zone.
My only real issue with the WvW season is that they put the strongest server on the easiest side (south west) and the lower twos on the North and Southeastern side… The strongest servers should be put on Southeast and the weakest (Southwest)
The southwest is the easiest to defend in my opinion
Playing outnumbered do not means tyo loose….. thats the challange!
I always wanted to see the miracle when 10 man zerg can successfully defend the only tower they just flipped on the whole map against two 50 man zergs who are just too lazy to fight each other.
Im pretty sure its impossible to have two 50 man zergs on one team. The most ive legitimately seen is about 70, which to most people looks like 100.
Playing outnumbered do not means tyo loose….. thats the challange!
I always wanted to see the miracle when 10 man zerg can successfully defend the only tower they just flipped on the whole map against two 50 man zergs who are just too lazy to fight each other.
Called, 10 men on a ton of superior siege.
You can’t build siege out of thin air. Did I say the only tower? That means no camp, nothing else than the tower. Even if the whole group had maxed sup mastery, used none of it for rams (just lol) they would have to be lucky to have any sups in the tower when flipped to build enough acs. Hey, it is a pug zerg, some don’t even know what “ac” is or how to pick sups.
Playing outnumbered do not means tyo loose….. thats the challange!
I always wanted to see the miracle when 10 man zerg can successfully defend the only tower they just flipped on the whole map against two 50 man zergs who are just too lazy to fight each other.
Im pretty sure its impossible to have two 50 man zergs on one team. The most ive legitimately seen is about 70, which to most people looks like 100.
There are 3 servers in each matchup, if two have 50 man zergs, how is this impossible? Perhaps you assume only 1 server would attack but I wrote “fight each other” … honestly, learn to read.
Easiest ppt/karma/loot bags are from attacking the weakest. 50 vs 50? you never know if you win or lose. 50 vs 10? That’s guaranteed and all they need is to cap the tower before the other server gets there.
From FSP point of view, I see RoF being a nice server with lots of good guilds, I had a lot of awesome fights against you and you definitely deserve to be in a better spot in the ladder but, on the other hand, i see RoF being one of the most QQing server I’v met.
Last season FSP was second lowest in the silver league and of course we went against much more populated servers, but we never surrendered and ended up 5th. Instead I’m constantly hearing RoF complaining about something and afaik some guilds even boycotted the season because of a bunch of idiots on my server. That’s not the right attitude imho and it’s definitely not helpful for your server if you are planning to recruit some guilds for more coverage.
This is not intended to start a server war or a flame thread, i’m just giving my honest opinion on actually one the best silver eu server on the battlefield.
Too bad you can’t get more coverage and fight again with us.
Ci Assediamo Da Soli [SIGH] ~ Officier
Playing outnumbered do not means tyo loose….. thats the challange!
I always wanted to see the miracle when 10 man zerg can successfully defend the only tower they just flipped on the whole map against two 50 man zergs who are just too lazy to fight each other.
Im pretty sure its impossible to have two 50 man zergs on one team. The most ive legitimately seen is about 70, which to most people looks like 100.
“10 man zerg” , im off the game for some time u cant imagine how that sounded beautiful, made me miss wvw even more.
“10 man zerg”
ohh I do so love being in silverL.
almost no queues,
almost no lag,
and your fair share of 10 man zergs on all sides!
Since here I even get to solo camps again
it is more of a challenge than goldL cause you actually get to play instead of waiting for hours.
but you don’t know what you have, if you haven’t had the other.
“10 man zerg”
ohh I do so love being in silverL.
almost no queues,
almost no lag,
and your fair share of 10 man zergs on all sides!
Since here I even get to solo camps again
it is more of a challenge than goldL cause you actually get to play instead of waiting for hours.but you don’t know what you have, if you haven’t had the other.
I actually know what i have ^^
I must say I’m also from RoF and we (my guild [FFS] and I) love these outnumbered fights and we have been fighting our kitten of and having more fun in Silver L!!
The only thing that bothers me a bit is having the 5-10ppl que’s now (Ok they are not WOW kitten que’s but we came from having no que’s to having them in like 2 weeks since some guilds joined RoF since we where going from bronze to silver). And also the times where we run around with 15-20ppl and only find groups of 10-25ppl to fight against (unless they are a good guildgroup, they are more challenging and fun then the pug groups/zergs)
So yeah for the ppl on those overstacked servers it might not be fun or challenging. But for us it is, there is nothing more fun then being outnumbered 50-20 and still winning the fight. (doesn’t happen all the time but enough times).
So plz do not whine about other servers having more ppl and that it is hard to win, it is what makes it fun! I personally would rather play and fight on Vabbi then in the Gold League’s first and full stacked server.