WVW my 2 cents

WVW my 2 cents

in WvW

Posted by: Talyn Sneider.1825

Talyn Sneider.1825

Hi ANET, first of all tkx for a great game and for all your hard work, i can only imagine how much work you have right now…so here are my two cents:

->Imbalance in wvw ( create queues to launch a wvw match taking in account the number of players based on the lower server population, so if you have largely populated servers facing each other you’ll have 200 vs 200 etc, etc… ) this way wvw would be balanced in number of players removing much of the problems that plague it right now. This would mean that there would be several wvw matches for larger servers that could accumulate to the server total score. Implementation would be similar to the overflow in other maps.

Hope this is helpful in any way,
Best regards

Casual pvp’er – Can only play 2-3 hours a day

https://www.gw2pvp.de/profile/ab4bd8fa4c3f250ac9533c479b0b862b/

WVW my 2 cents

in WvW

Posted by: GuardianOMS.8067

GuardianOMS.8067

WvW is not meant to be fair. No balance needed.

Sgt Killjoy – “Pedantic” “babe” and “bff” of Saiyr
The devs don’t care about WvW so I’m gonna kill players in PvE!

WVW my 2 cents

in WvW

Posted by: Runty Choir.4893

Runty Choir.4893

WvW is not meant to be fair. No balance needed.

As someone said in a previous thread. WvW isnt supposed to be fair but Anet shouldnt be making it more unfair either.

Alpha
Victrixx [xVx]

WVW my 2 cents

in WvW

Posted by: TyPin.9860

TyPin.9860

The fariness is not the problem. A server of 2 ppl should not have equal chances against a server with 200. But there should be playable content for both servers.

The arena style map changes are actually quite good imho. The bloodlust buff, as said above, is the thing that many don’t like. It basicly just favors the higher populated server. In even matchups it would be fine. But most matchups are highly uneven…

[ROSE] – Fissure of Woe
Chronomancy works, I am proof of it. Now stop asking me questions. Time must be preserved!

WVW my 2 cents

in WvW

Posted by: Talyn Sneider.1825

Talyn Sneider.1825

WvW is not meant to be fair. No balance needed.

Easily you could have underdog maps, for all the fans of playing one against a mob or zerg fanatics out there, the base idea of my post still stands in my humble opinion.

Casual pvp’er – Can only play 2-3 hours a day

https://www.gw2pvp.de/profile/ab4bd8fa4c3f250ac9533c479b0b862b/

WVW my 2 cents

in WvW

Posted by: Talyn Sneider.1825

Talyn Sneider.1825

The fariness is not the problem. A server of 2 ppl should not have equal chances against a server with 200. But there should be playable content for both servers.

The arena style map changes are actually quite good imho. The bloodlust buff, as said above, is the thing that many don’t like. It basicly just favors the higher populated server. In even matchups it would be fine. But most matchups are highly uneven…

I respect your point of view, but i’ve come to realize that gw is a skill dependent game, seems only natural that an equal fighting chance would be given to lower rank servers. Or else the game will flux into a major migration to top servers until a balance is obtained with much grievance and lag along the way.

There could be balanced and unbalanced matches if ANET agrees with you, and that would be a compromise between several types of players.

Casual pvp’er – Can only play 2-3 hours a day

https://www.gw2pvp.de/profile/ab4bd8fa4c3f250ac9533c479b0b862b/