(edited by cpchow.7416)
Why PVP seasons but no WvW tournament?
I found all tourneys silly as the winners were decided by the moment they started.
Madness Rises [Rise] – Banners Hold.
Don’t argue with idiots, they pull you down their level and own you with experience.
I found all tourneys silly as the winners were decided by the moment they started.
I found all PVP seasons silly as the winners were decided by the moment they started.
Was there ever a problem in SPvP where after the first few games a bunch of people transferred onto the winning team so they could fight 20v5 for the rest of the season and then pat themselves on the back for “winning”?
LGN
I found all tourneys silly as the winners were decided by the moment they started.
This, and Anet has in their possession data that seems to indicate a large drop-off in wvw population after a tournament ends, which they surmised was caused by burnout. Since Anet wants as many wvw players as will play, they are hesitant to hold a tournament out of concern of losing players from the game mode after.
I found all tourneys silly as the winners were decided by the moment they started.
This, and Anet has in their possession data that seems to indicate a large drop-off in wvw population after a tournament ends, which they surmised was caused by burnout. Since Anet wants as many wvw players as will play, they are hesitant to hold a tournament out of concern of losing players from the game mode after.
This can be apply to sPVP too. The pvp lobbies are empty after a PVP season ends, which they surmised was caused by burnout. If Anet wants as many pvp players as will play, they are hesitant to hold a pvp season out of concern of losing players from the game mode after.
(edited by cpchow.7416)
I found all tourneys silly as the winners were decided by the moment they started.
I found all PVP seasons silly as the winners were decided by the moment they started.
So why bother asking for more if they’re pointless in a competitive way.
Madness Rises [Rise] – Banners Hold.
Don’t argue with idiots, they pull you down their level and own you with experience.
I found all tourneys silly as the winners were decided by the moment they started.
I found all PVP seasons silly as the winners were decided by the moment they started.
So why bother asking for more if they’re pointless in a competitive way.
Anet can either give us another WvW tournament or stop the pvp league forever.
Cuz WvW isn’t #esportz
Cuz WvW isn’t #esportz
RIP WVW
So you think that sPvP seasons are bad and also want something bad to WvW just to be equal?
I found all tourneys silly as the winners were decided by the moment they started.
This, and Anet has in their possession data that seems to indicate a large drop-off in wvw population after a tournament ends, which they surmised was caused by burnout. Since Anet wants as many wvw players as will play, they are hesitant to hold a tournament out of concern of losing players from the game mode after.
This can be apply to sPVP too. The pvp lobbies are empty after a PVP season ends, which they surmised was caused by burnout. If Anet wants as many pvp players as will play, they are hesitant to hold a pvp season out of concern of losing players from the game mode after.
They are run by different teams. Anet also seems to be “all-in” on sPVP shelling out thousands of dollars that could have been spent hiring several developers full time to develop content.
I’m not saying they’re ideologically consistent, but they had admitted the player dropoff is the reason they don’t hold wvw tournaments.
I found all tourneys silly as the winners were decided by the moment they started.
This, and Anet has in their possession data that seems to indicate a large drop-off in wvw population after a tournament ends, which they surmised was caused by burnout. Since Anet wants as many wvw players as will play, they are hesitant to hold a tournament out of concern of losing players from the game mode after.
This can be apply to sPVP too. The pvp lobbies are empty after a PVP season ends, which they surmised was caused by burnout. If Anet wants as many pvp players as will play, they are hesitant to hold a pvp season out of concern of losing players from the game mode after.
They are run by different teams. Anet also seems to be “all-in” on sPVP shelling out thousands of dollars that could have been spent hiring several developers full time to develop content.
I’m not saying they’re ideologically consistent, but they had admitted the player dropoff is the reason they don’t hold wvw tournaments.
You didn’t answer my question, there is a player dropoff after the PVP league, why don’t anet hold the PVP league?
Anet can just apply the same system of PVP league to WvW tournament. There is no ‘server winner’ in the WvW tournament but personal victory. WvW players starts from rank 1 in the WvW tournament to rank 6 legendary. The more time and efforts spent in WvW the higher rank they are. WvW legendary back would be included in the legendary rank. It the easier way to solve all the problem of the WvW tournament but someone didn’t use their brain to ‘think’ and just said : WvW tournament is bad , lets buried it forever
I found all tourneys silly as the winners were decided by the moment they started.
This, and Anet has in their possession data that seems to indicate a large drop-off in wvw population after a tournament ends, which they surmised was caused by burnout. Since Anet wants as many wvw players as will play, they are hesitant to hold a tournament out of concern of losing players from the game mode after.
This can be apply to sPVP too. The pvp lobbies are empty after a PVP season ends, which they surmised was caused by burnout. If Anet wants as many pvp players as will play, they are hesitant to hold a pvp season out of concern of losing players from the game mode after.
They are run by different teams. Anet also seems to be “all-in” on sPVP shelling out thousands of dollars that could have been spent hiring several developers full time to develop content.
I’m not saying they’re ideologically consistent, but they had admitted the player dropoff is the reason they don’t hold wvw tournaments.
You didn’t answer my question, there is a player dropoff after the PVP league, why don’t anet hold the PVP league?
That was the first thing I answered.
They are run by different teams. Anet also seems to be “all-in” on sPVP shelling out thousands of dollars
(…)
I’m not saying they’re ideologically consistent
It the easier way to solve all the problem of the WvW tournament but someone didn’t use their brain to ‘think’ and just said : WvW tournament is bad , lets buried it forever
God bless the person that did it. We don’t need more of that.
WvW Rank 3800 (Platinum Veteran) – PvP Rank 69 (Shark) – 25,9k Achievment Points
Mërcenaries [Sold] – Ferguson’s Crossing
Tournaments…using World Linking & Glicko…No Thanks.
Healthy competition between all servers isn’t possible atm…imho
Skirmishes is a good game mechanic, but it can only provide hope to the hourly small fights even if the weekly battle can already be decided based on the Match-Up.
PvP is not a 24/7 constant competitive game mode involving hundreds of players and multiple servers like WvW. PvP is random 5v5 matches that lasts minutes. WvW is heavily dependent on a sustainable population. And unlike in WvW, in PvP your basically just playing for personal advancement.
Honesty is not insulting, stupidity is.
>Class Balance is a Joke<