Guild Wars 2

Are the scores posted anywhere? The ones ones on:

https://leaderboards.guildwars2.com/en/na/wvw

are completely jacked up. I know we’re in week 3 of 4, but it’d be nice to see scores posted somewhere by Anet.

Thanks,

I looked at the match history available on http://mos.millenium.org/na/matchups/ and based on that I think these are the current NA standings:

	Week1	Week2	Total

BG	#1 +5	#1 +5	10
TC	#3 +2	#1 +5	7
SoS	#1 +5	#3 +2	7
JQ	#2 +3	#2 +3	6
FA	#2 +3	#2 +3	6
Mag#3 +2	#3 +2	4

YB	#1 +5	#1 +5	10
DB	#2 +3	#1 +5	8
NSP	#1 +5	#2 +3	8
CD	#3 +2	#1 +5	7
SBI	#1 +5	#3 +2	7
IoJ	#2 +3	#2 +3	6
DR	#3 +2	#2 +3	5
HoD#2 +3	#3 +2	5
BP	#3 +2	#3 +2	4

GoM#1 +5	#1 +5	10
SoR	#2 +3	#1 +5	8
EB	#1 +5	#2 +3	8
DH	#3 +2	#1 +5	7
FC	#1 +5	#3 +2	7
KN	#2 +3	#2 +3	6
SF	#3 +2	#2 +3	5
AR	#2 +3	#3 +2	5
ET	#3 +2	#3 +2	4

“#1 +5” means that server came in first place that week and got 5 tournament points as a result. second place gives 3 points and third place gives 2 points.

-ken

and here’s the standings for EU (assuming I didn’t miscalculate):

	Week1	Week2	Total

SFR	#1 +5	#1 +5	10
Des	#2 +3	#1 +5	8
BB	#1 +5	#2 +3	8
Kod	#3 +2	#1 +5	7
ER	#1 +5	#3 +2	7
Gan	#2 +3	#2 +3	6
JS	#3 +2	#2 +3	5
FSP	#2 +3	#3 +2	5
RS	#3 +2	#3 +2	4

PS	#1 +5	#1 +5	10
AR	#2 +3	#1 +5	8
GH	#1 +5	#2 +3	8
AM	#3 +2	#1 +5	7
DL	#1 +5	#3 +2	7
AG	#2 +3	#2 +3	6
VS	#3 +2	#2 +3	5
AS	#2 +3	#3 +2	5
FR	#3 +2	#3 +2	4

RoF	#1 +5	#1 +5	10
MS	#2 +3	#1 +5	8
Dz	#1 +5	#2 +3	8
RoS	#3 +2	#1 +5	7
WSR#1 +5	#3 +2	7
Vab	#2 +3	#2 +3	6
BT	#2 +3	#3 +2	5
UW	#3 +2	#2 +3	5
FoW#3 +2	#3 +2	4

-ken

Probably because even they know it means nothing. MOS didn’t even take the time to do it either. The event known as “Seasons” is just a fluff for regular weeks of WvW.

The original guy that did MOS was on Vizunah, Vizunah doesn’t exist anymore (compared to a year ago at least), maybe he left and doesn’t care about GW2 anymore. It’s just running fully automated

people care a lot less about the standings now, since the ticket rewards are being distributed week-by-week. really the standings are only useful for predicting matchups (and determining which servers are going to get the tournament finisher after week 4).

-ken

I don’t think they are using 5/3/1 this time around. I looked it over last night since I was wondering why the T2 match was JQ/FA/Mag instead of SoS/FA/Mag as predicted. Under the S2 system, JQ and SoS should have the same number of points and JQ would place higher due to rating being the tie breaker.

After looking at each league (both NA and EU), my conclusion is that placing first is more highly valued this time around. This is why servers that have placed first and third in their two matches are higher ranked than servers that placed second in both matches. You see this happen in every league. I don’t know the values used this time around, but if you substituted 5/3/1 with 3/1/0 or something similar, all of the current matchups make more sense.

EDIT: Snowreap figured the new values are 5/3/2 and edited his lists above.

it looks like they are actually using 5/3/2 this time. I will edit my previous posts to correct this. thanks for pointing it out.

-ken

Snowreap.5174:

it looks like they are actually using 5/3/2 this time. I will edit my previous posts to correct this. thanks for pointing it out.

-ken

Nice. How did you figure out the exact values?

Maybe he checked the GW2 Wiki? http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/WvW_Fall_Tournament_2014#Tournament_Standings

It wasn’t a secret.

I looked here:
https://leaderboards.guildwars2.com/en/na/wvwsilver

from that I guessed that third place gives 2 points (look at BP), and therefore second place must give 3 (based on DR and HoD). the result for DB indicated that 5 points might still be correct for first place.

I tried those numbers and they seemed to fit.

(edit: ha, didn’t think of the wiki. that would have been a much smarter way to find out).

-ken