WvW population limit? currently unfair
I posted this earlier.. have a read:
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/wuv/wuv/Total-Flop-of-Ranked-Servers/3147466
i figured this would have been posted before
i really don’t see a better solution though. Population is by far the number 1 issue. it makes total sense to soft cap it to keep the playing field fair. I would much rather see a fair 40v40 battle than an 80v20 battle that a lot of us see far too often. It doesn’t matter which gimmicky solution gets implemented if the population issue still exists and we continue to see these 80v20 fights. Its different of course if its 80v20 and the other server has 60 people elsewhere but that’s not the case. those other 60 don’t exist 99% of the time
i figured this would have been posted before
i really don’t see a better solution though. Population is by far the number 1 issue. it makes total sense to soft cap it to keep the playing field fair. I would much rather see a fair 40v40 battle than an 80v20 battle that a lot of us see far too often. It doesn’t matter which gimmicky solution gets implemented if the population issue still exists and we continue to see these 80v20 fights. Its different of course if its 80v20 and the other server has 60 people elsewhere but that’s not the case. those other 60 don’t exist 99% of the time
I agree with you on this. There should be a soft cap where the other servers have to match the lowest server cap. The issue is though that the larger servers will have much longer ques because they cannot get more into a map because the other servers do not have as many people in. The larger servers may complain about it, but I think the good this is that it may even out servers some. People could transfer to lower population servers to spread out the people making it more competitive across all servers.
My two cents worth