Guild Wars 2

ok, i understand why they did this..but i wanted to point out that one of the forum GMs may want to correct what he said.

JonPeters.5630:

Thanks for this catch. I will look at it on Monday.

Invuln and invis are intended to stop you from capping, but simple evades are not.

Jon

was posted
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/pvp/pvp/GS-bug-is-making-ranger-less-viable/first#post899698

if the invis is intended to stop you from capping, then why did they change it?

not complaining, jsut pointing out you might want ot edit that before peopel get the wrong idea.

What he means is that you being invulnerable/invisible is intended to stop you from being able to cap something. Not that an invisible player should stop you (being visible) from capping.

ok, that makes sense. wish he had phrased it like that because it takes a different meaning based off if you read it as the person stealthed or the person trying to cap.