Is it A or B?
Engineer lobbyist is what came to mind after reading your last sentence.
That last sentence would be an ideal situation but from a management standpoint, I just don’t see them doing that. It’s nice to hope tho.
Need to do something about Izzy, he’s proven in the past just how he balances things (25/90 is just one example out of many).
I just wish “balancing the Engineer” for once meant buffing instead of nerfing. The Engineer Grenade Kit was doing too much damage? Nerf it! No point in trying to bring the other kits up to its level so that the Engineer does sensible damage compared to other classes. Nope.
Anet don’t talk to us about it because it wont do any good. All over-communicating ever does is make players angrier. Talking to angry players won’t make the developers fix anything faster or change their minds, nor does it make angry players suddenly better understand the situation, realize the error of their thinking and inspire them to just “get good.”
If I was Anet I wouldn’t talk to you guys either, even if I was working on fixing everything being complained about.
The maximum communication should be “we are looking at engineer improvements for a later patch.” That’s it. And even then this could easily give players an impression of the way the changes will work and what kind of timeframe they will arrive and usually make them angrier than they would have been when they fall short.
Judging by the updates it’s A
You may be more wise as to ask a better question. Where or with whom are we now communicating to, and with? I suggest you look into /dev/#thief
(edited by Lunar Corporation.5720)
what communication? when was the last useful post from someone at AN in the eng forum?
communication = both ways.