(edited by Zlater.6789)
Chrono Might
Yeah, that’s more or less accurate. Obviously 5 might is going to be the close to perfect rotation, so it’s more realistic to assume 3-4 on average in a real encounter.
From personal experience:
- a novice mesmer new to a raid encounter will keep up 30-40% boons (most noticable from quickness and alacrity uptimes).
- 70-80% is decent and probably realistic since fights have phases and targets aren’t always available for rotation purposes (90% is ideal and most experienced mesmers will hit the 80-90%.)
- 100% perfect scenario from perfect play and the boss allowing for such
That being said, mesmers primary role isn’t might uptime, that’s what your PS or cPS is for and since there is no workaround for banners you want one of those per group.
Tl;dr: what Fay said.
(edited by Cyninja.2954)
In encounters where you (can/should) play Domi/Illu you automaticly generate less might and fury. That being sad, those two boons should already be maxxed out even without your assistance. You only help the Druids / Berserkers out a bit, but it’s not your primary role.
“Mentoring engineers / mesmers and showing you what you can do with your fantastic class!
Just pm me for my advice! Always eager to help!”
That’s very helpful, I understand it possible to squeeze even more out if you can get the timing just right on passive signet procs in CS. But that shouldnt be considered because it should only be possible if you are not maintaining your rotation correctly. And the rotation isn’t built for the primary purpose of sharing might/swiftness/fury/regeneration(well this one a little)/vigor/protection, it’s there for quickness and alac.
I’m not really worried about my role as a mesmer, I only ask because I want a deeper understanding of how the group is designed to function as a whole. This time specifically pertaining to might.
Thankyou for your replies and all of the input. If there was anything I missed about party might I will send nudes if you tell me. (That’s a lie, but much appreciation will be had)
(edited by Zlater.6789)