Guild Wars 2

Ravezaar.4951:

As a WvW player mainly I also agree with DemonCow and tho Iam looking forward to Reaper cant believe they did stuff like this, ok we got alot of good Buffs and Necro is one of the classes that benefits most from getting 3 full traitlines imho. Nerfing CC and Sp.W is insane 2 skills that made us intresting is now badly hurt.

For WvW Guild raids I think I will swap to the Shout Heal with HoT (5 targets + LF gain) seems stronger now and lower CD then CC. Never tought this would come…

Well just to be sure Shroud Knight is required to run it, so you wont get quicker wells from Blood Magic if youre running a backline build.

Unless you opt out of spite or soul reaping which would be insane.

ImdA.4701:

30-0.67(33%)=20.1

So with trait the CD of CC will be 20s. That’s not that bad.

Who knows what additional condition it adds…the one on Plague probably pulses and what could they possibly add on top of weakness to CPC. I didn’t play GW but this look similar to their corruptions style the only benefit here is CD reduction transfers are already busy with the foes conditions.

Edit:*doesn’t look

Pregnantman.8259:

I think this would be a fair change if they increased base heal by like %50, made it instant cast or short cast like other Corruption skills and/or apply the Vulnurability while casting the heal so that it is removed when cast is finished (and is consumed) or it stays if cast is interrupted (counterplay). Consume Conditions is chosen more for the full condition removal and much less for the amount it heals, so adding something to counter that without buffing the skill is just butchering it.

If they insist on keeping the skill the way it is maybe they can change Resistance in a way that it negates the damage increase that comes with Vulnurability along with its capability to negate condition damage – it wouldn’t be that far off considering the upcoming Vulnurability change. It can be further improved in QoL – players having damaging conditions with Resistance can remain OOC – similar to blocking/dodging/invulnurability to normal attacks. Then they can just slap Resistance on Master of Corruption trait to have it apply to all Corruption skills and normalize the durations of the self applied conditions. Or better yet, have the trait apply Resistance to allies within range as well.

Resistance negates all effects from conditions from what Im seeing. Which would be vulnerability as well. I made sure a while back on whether it said damage or effects.
So you will not feel immobs even if they are put on you.

https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Resistance

Sagat.3285:

skowcia.8257:

Sagat.3285:

@skowcia They will find a way believe me it will be close even if not next to engi. Let’s remember we only saw the core specialisation of only 1 legend.

We miss power traitline, eltie spec and 2 (dps and cc ) legends or 3 if elite spec turn out to provide another one. Unless they develop more utility skills to choose from i doubt rev will be all that viable.

Also lets not forget that Roy develops revenant, that alone is not a good sigh if we look at changes to war and ranger in general I hope im wrong tho.

I believe he only made Ventari and I believe he’s war/ele we saw old trait system rev lines not new.

Karl develop ele. As for rev even his signature says

“Twitter: @RoyCronacher
I work on systems, skills, and balance, among other things.
Also the designer for the Revenant. xD”

Revenant traits was developed with new trait system and they are far from old. Rev already had olny 3 traits per tier, so im not sure how they can be old at all

Sagat.3285:

ImdA.4701:

30-0.67(33%)=20.1

So with trait the CD of CC will be 20s. That’s not that bad.

Who knows what additional condition it adds…the one on Plague probably pulses and what could they possibly add on top of weakness to CPC. I didn’t play GW but this look similar to their corruptions style the only benefit here is CD reduction transfers are already busy with the foes conditions.

It’ll be additional Vulnerability stacks no? Or they’ll add another condi?

@skowcia I see

@ImdA Unsure but It sounds like another condition based on wording.