New meta for the terrormancer?

New meta for the terrormancer?

in Necromancer

Posted by: akaCryptic.2389

akaCryptic.2389

Is there a new meta for the terrormancer or are people still trying stuff out since the FitG change?
I would like this thread to be a discussion about trait and utility choices, explain your reasoning behind certain choices and your experience.

I have settled on 04406 with hemophilia and reapers protection. Corrupt boon, signet of spite, spectral armour. I lack LF gain without SA and the signet is devastating when used on a thief or engi which are almost always present in a team. Honestly i dont miss wurm much with its buggy nature. Though i am unsure how useful hemophilia actually is, currently I find the build very strong with right positioning.

New meta for the terrormancer?

in Necromancer

Posted by: Malsheem.1794

Malsheem.1794

Hi

Its hard to tell whether people are still testing or not. As for me personally, i dont use it because of 2 reasons.

1.
I dont want an ability that forces me into DS. You get stunned and use DS, using the LF you have saved. Then you`ll take massive damage and youre pretty much screwed – no LF and even if you had, its on CD.
In that case, i would rather use an utility stunbreaker and save the DS for a situation I see fit and not my opponent.
2.
When i go 6 into Soul Reaping, i would rather choose Soul Marks as the 3. trait. I feel it gives me additional tank which is needed, especially as condi. More LF = more fear/Dark path/torment and as it is right now, i think necro needs to capitalize as much as possible on condi damage. Which is also why i always go 6 into Curses. With all the condi-cleanse, i feel i need to do as much damage as possible when i finally get some condi stacked.

With that being said, i never used more than one stunbreaker before. I know “meta” is FW/SW, but ive done pretty well with only one, mostly FW. I find most situations to be either sure death or manageable. A 2. stunbreak wouldnt have saved me and i would rather try not to end in those situation (although sometimes impossible) and instead slot condi damage utilitis such as Signet of Spite, WoC and such.

I doubt the new FitG is new meta, but i really dont know. I should however mention, that im only talking from a spvp point of view and not WvW, where i have 0 experience.

- my 2 cents

New meta for the terrormancer?

in Necromancer

Posted by: Roe.3679

Roe.3679

I really like the new FITG, it’s been so valuable breaking a few extra stuns and being able to cover my heal with stability, or getting a safe stomp without blowing other cool downs. Easy swap for me to go from greater marks to FITG.

New meta for the terrormancer?

in Necromancer

Posted by: Rym.1469

Rym.1469

As I’ve never used Greater Marks after they swapped that trait somewhere in 2013 to Master and I didn’t find neither Transfusion or RProtection that amazingly useful in current meta, I’ll probably remain in 0/6/2/0/6 for now. Also, not a fan of Soul Marks after changes to Mark of Evasion. Besides some bonus LF at the start of the match, I feel like it’s so marginal in my playstyle and does virtually not much at all. MoE change killed it for me.

FTIG Allows for safestomping which is a thing, makes it faster to deal with turret boredom plague, allows me to use my beloved Epidemic everywhere I go.

So yeah, that was a pretty cool change, although doesn’t make Condimancer suddenly 100% more viable for tPvP. Stupid Medi Tardians ;> .

Trait is 100% optional, viable, influences playstyle and rotations, has counters, has synergy but doesn’t force it and is up to personal preference. Imo, one of examples of well designed GM trait.

[rude]Antagonistka – Revenant, EU.
[SALT]Natchniony – Necromancer, EU.
Streams: http://www.twitch.tv/rym144