Love how nerfs aren't considered 'balancing'

Love how nerfs aren't considered 'balancing'

in Ranger

Posted by: Bryzy.2719

Bryzy.2719

October…. Ranger nerf

October…. CJ: “We’re doing balancing every quarter as of the beginning of 2016”

November…. Ranger nerf

December…. Ranger nerf

December…. CJ: “I repeat, we’re doing balancing every quarter as of the beginning of 2016”.

So clearly then buffs are considered “balancing”, and slowly ebbing away the functionality of the Ranger/Druid is not, so the devs are free to do it as much as they like between quarters.

Love how nerfs aren't considered 'balancing'

in Ranger

Posted by: Kaiyanwan.8521

Kaiyanwan.8521

The “idea” of balancing ANet came up with is a sad joke.

Every three monthes they will kick working classes in the teeth and broken/useless classes need to wait three monthes to get fixed.

Meanwhile they nerf the ranger/druid whenever they want just because they can.

Professionals at work here.

Love how nerfs aren't considered 'balancing'

in Ranger

Posted by: Tragic Positive.9356

Tragic Positive.9356

They had the chance to say sorry and say:
Sorry guyz, the bugs you have to endure are too hard to analyze and code through for what we apologize and you’ll have to bear with the changes that are easy to be fixed.

But they always sugarcoat their words with blatant lies and false promises. If that’s the way they want to lose their money, I guess I’m in no position to question them.
They had a choice, after all.

“Observe, learn and counter.”

Love how nerfs aren't considered 'balancing'

in Ranger

Posted by: Morwath.9817

Morwath.9817

I’ve no words.

+1