Pet Taunt against Players

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: Fester.9328

Fester.9328

Q:

Will the enemy player actually “detarget” the ranger and then target the pet? Or will it be that the pet takes the damage of an attack like Protect Me?

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: choovanski.5462

choovanski.5462

A:

https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Taunt

thats the best you will get

. Engi & Warr . Beta > 2017 Death of PvP
currently a Boyfriend main :P
Waiting To ReRoll Mystic & Forget About Tyria

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: Shadelang.3012

Shadelang.3012

from what I understand its a force detarget and loss of control skill

Ghost Yak

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: Lyger.5429

Lyger.5429

Yea and only your auto attack will be used I believe.

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: Fester.9328

Fester.9328

Is this not explained anywhere?

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: singinggecko.5736

singinggecko.5736

From the rumors I’ve heard, that’s what it’ll do. I’m really not adding anything. Just keeping the thread fresh so some developer can give us clarity on this…. wink wink

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: Heimskarl Ashfiend.9582

Heimskarl Ashfiend.9582

nudge nudge, say no more, say no more, eh?

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: singinggecko.5736

singinggecko.5736

Or we just keep saying more until we can just get someone to post something red!

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: Fester.9328

Fester.9328

https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Taunt

thats the best you will get

I guess that explains it…thanks!

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: singinggecko.5736

singinggecko.5736

Well the thing that I’m not 100% clear on is whether the autoattacks are being sent out at your own will or if they’re just being spammed. This might not be as big of a deal for a fast attacking class like a thief that has daggers but someone using a hammer getting forced to swing it without control on timing could have a lot more trouble with this condition. I’m just curious as to how it will work in that regard. “Taunt is a control effect that forces the affected target to run towards the source of taunt with all skills except stun breakers disabled while using their auto-attack skill.” This sounds like you would not have any control in my understanding of it. How do other people interpret this?

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: Heimskarl Ashfiend.9582

Heimskarl Ashfiend.9582

It’s the opposite of fear, but you are flailing your AA around at the same time.

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: LughLongArm.5460

LughLongArm.5460

They presnted the the taunt effect once on the firs revenant reveal. The taunted traget will run toward the taunting source and will attempt to spam auto attack it. The source is your pet so i belive the target will run toward the pet.

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: ChillyChinaman.6057

ChillyChinaman.6057

Just to clarify, after having watched the video, taunt forces the target to run toward then source, and THEN they start auto-attacking. Is this correct?

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: Fester.9328

Fester.9328

See, i was hoping that the enemy would “detarget” me and pick up my pet as a target. That would have been useful.

Pet Taunt against Players

in Ranger

Posted by: Yamsandjams.3267

Yamsandjams.3267

I don’t see why it would force a “detarget”, it will just force you to move at and engage in an auto-attack sequence on the pet.

Just to clarify, after having watched the video, taunt forces the target to run toward then source, and THEN they start auto-attacking. Is this correct?

I believe so, I don’t think they will engage in the auto-attack sequence if the opponent is not in range.

Now if you target a ranged opponent, I assume they will still move to the target while attacking, whereas I think a melee opponent won’t actually attack until they’re in range.

I wonder if disabling your auto-attack would have an effect on it (i.e. not auto-attacking at all).