What about a decent specialization.

What about a decent specialization.

in Ranger

Posted by: Lazze.9870

Lazze.9870

Plese arenanet stop creating kittenty stuff for class wich will take them more down, i`m still amazed that after 2 years you finally made rangers good atleast on shooting at range …

Your problem is that you want the ranger to be a dedicated archer. It never was, it never will be.

What about a decent specialization.

in Ranger

Posted by: Atherakhia.4086

Atherakhia.4086

I’ve been a fan of the staff and druid angle for a long time now. You’ll find my posts in the old cdi thread hoping for just this kind of thing. The reason I like the idea of the staff and druid angle is they have the potential to completely change the way the entire class is played.

This is where your idea, while entertaining, fails imo. You really don’t change how the class will play. You kind of just expand on what the class currently has.

The expansion needs to draw people back in. It can’t do that by introducing more of the same. Hopefully the Druid doesn’t disappoint us.

What about a decent specialization.

in Ranger

Posted by: Yelloweyedemon.2860

Yelloweyedemon.2860

Plese arenanet stop creating kittenty stuff for class wich will take them more down, i`m still amazed that after 2 years you finally made rangers good atleast on shooting at range …

Your problem is that you want the ranger to be a dedicated archer. It never was, it never will be.

Pretty much. No matter how much you spam the forums with your pet hate and your obsession to “change” the class to a hunter, they are not going to revert a 2year old class to a huntard bow-pewpew thing because you don’t like the way the class is made.