Guild Wars 2

Maybe you should be banned for hacking your HP bar and forcing the Thief’s hand.

lol he got hit for that high in sPvP, is that even possible.

Nice tattoos…

Dontcare Aboutnames.9284:

Screen Shot says it all….

http://i.imgur.com/Ocl4xxE.jpg

No it doesn’t. Sword needs a nerf.

Proof
vvvv

notice how he’s absolutely naked in the photo…

lol, going all the way to 0 armor just to fake an argument?
photoshop would have been easier

No armour, possibly high vitality, and in downed state.

nope.jpg

Burnfall.9573:

I dare anyone to call the OP a liar or “don’t know what he’s talking about”!

Any honest thieves with physical evidence, “please stand up”

Another evidence of thief’s madness.

This is way too ridiculous and unbearing.

Not sure if serious or trolling, so, dare excepted.

Please check the following link –
http://gw2skills.net/editor/?fYAQJAoYEFnTEbP8ZO5pXByq9gmtEmA-ToAg0CqI4SxljLDXSuscNKYCB

There we have listed the absolute max combined power a thief can possibly have in SPvP – 25 stacks of bloodlust, 25 stacks of might, Assassins sig, 30 points in both DA and CS, equipped with zerkers, scholar runes, and a sigil of force as well as dagger training. (You’ll have to manually add 25 stacks of bloodlust/Might, and set the target to the light armor since apparently those do not get saved)

I’m going to do some sloppy math below, but if you’d like the figure out the exact max strike for yourself, here are some tips – Don’t forget to add up all the conditional damage % boosters (Exposed weakness, first strike,s executioner, and scholars – Force and dagger training are already factored in, so don’t add those) for a total of 50%. Note that the target I’ve chosen is at 2000 armor (IE, a Glass Cannon).

Quick and dirty – 4441×.5+4441 = 6661.5 – total non crit damage when your target has a condition, is under 50%, you’re over 6 init, and you have over 90% health.

6661.5 × 1.03 + 6661.5 = ~13523 – A critical strike.

Go ahead and add 25 stacks of vulnerability in there, since we’re running this test with every single power buff on our supposed thief AND taking advantage of every single conditional damage % booster (IE, a situation so unlikely it might as well be impossible). You’ll find you still don’t do anywhere near the damage that screenshot listed. Also make sure to remember that we’re talking about a target with only 2,000 armor, which is below the absolute minimum armor you’d find on a warrior who’s wearing all his armor.

You know what? Lets add Frenzy AND 25 stacks of vulnerability!
13523 × .5 + 13523 = ~20285 – So in an absolute kittenstorm of perfect setup for the thief (which has a chance of happening approaching 0), your screenshot is still overblown more than 70 – 115%

Its possible I did the math slightly incorrect up there (I’m no expert on GW2’s system), but I’m willing to bet I didn’t miscalculate 20k damage into thin air.

TL;DR – Numbers bullkitten, proof above.

Evil, don’t bite. He’s a known troll.

Auesis.7301:

Evil, don’t bite. He’s a known troll.

Np, I’ll leave it at that. At least players who are less in the know now can come, look at the math, and understand.

I see evil needs a little bit more training. Just a little bit.

lol; if you want to know how it was done ~ me and a few guildies got bored one day so we decided to see how big a # we could get highest we got was over 100k on churning earth but 25 stacks of might/bloodlust/vulnerability and then the warrior is naked and uses frenzy for the 25% more dmg taken try it if you want

I laughed so hard as soon as I saw him naked

thank you OP, i LOL really hard.

Dontcare Aboutnames.9284:

Screen Shot says it all….

http://i.imgur.com/Ocl4xxE.jpg

Nice try, but next time you should wear an armor, before you tell us how “OP” a class is

He’s a warrior who’s naked and probably dropped frenzy, lols.

Wow. That’s a lot of damage!

Auesis.7301:

Evil, don’t bite. He’s a known troll.

Re-read my post and compare our both statements.

Where is your Cause?

None whatsoever.

>>>>>In other word, you are TheTroll<>>>>

Let me be.

Burnfall.9573:

Auesis.7301:

Evil, don’t bite. He’s a known troll.

Re-read my post and compare our both statements.

Where is your Cause?

None whatsoever.

>>>>>In other word, you are TheTroll<>>>>

Reversal doesn’t work in the art of trolling.

Zacchary.6183:

Burnfall.9573:

Auesis.7301:

Evil, don’t bite. He’s a known troll.

Re-read my post and compare our both statements.

Where is your Cause?

None whatsoever.

>>>>>In other word, you are TheTroll<>>>>

Reversal doesn’t work in the art of trolling.

And……………where your Cause?

None

Whatsoever!

Burnfall.9573:

Zacchary.6183:

Burnfall.9573:

Auesis.7301:

Evil, don’t bite. He’s a known troll.

Re-read my post and compare our both statements.

Where is your Cause?

None whatsoever.

>>>>>In other word, you are TheTroll<>>>>

Reversal doesn’t work in the art of trolling.

And……………where your Cause?

None

Whatsoever!

My cause is to point out fallacies.

Zacchary.6183:

Burnfall.9573:

Zacchary.6183:

Burnfall.9573:

Auesis.7301:

Evil, don’t bite. He’s a known troll.

Re-read my post and compare our both statements.

Where is your Cause?

None whatsoever.

>>>>>In other word, you are TheTroll<>>>>

Reversal doesn’t work in the art of trolling.

And……………where your Cause?

None

Whatsoever!

My cause is to point out fallacies.

Than the OP Factual Evidence and countless Factial Evidence since the begining of
gw2 forum, were all “Fallacies”?

What a bad joke lol

As the saying goes, “In-denial is the Fall of Man”

Lastly, “Never argue with one who’s In-denial, if you do, you will become 1One with him”

End of argument.

Burnfall.9573:

Zacchary.6183:

Burnfall.9573:

Zacchary.6183:

Burnfall.9573:

Auesis.7301:

Evil, don’t bite. He’s a known troll.

Re-read my post and compare our both statements.

Where is your Cause?

None whatsoever.

>>>>>In other word, you are TheTroll<>>>>

Reversal doesn’t work in the art of trolling.

And……………where your Cause?

None

Whatsoever!

My cause is to point out fallacies.

Than the OP Factual Evidence and countless Factial Evidence since the begining of the gw2 forum, were all “Fallacy”?

As the saying goes, “In-denial is the Fall of Man”

Lastly, “Never argue with one who’s In-denial, if you do, you will become 1One with him”

End of argument.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=RHTwL3013GA

/end thread

The real reason he’s naked is cause Backstab is so OP it also broke all of his gear. He obviously didn’t strip naked, and stack extremely favorable conditions to skew the numbers.

Obviously.

Dand.8231:

The real reason he’s naked is cause Backstab is so OP it also broke all of his gear. He obviously didn’t strip naked, and stack extremely favorable conditions to skew the numbers.

Obviously.

His armor got scared and dodged before it hit.

http://i.imgur.com/pWGWXFV.jpg

Screen Shot of a 100k Churning Earth for lulz

Auesis.7301:

Burnfall.9573:

Zacchary.6183:

Burnfall.9573:

Zacchary.6183:

Burnfall.9573:

Auesis.7301:

Evil, don’t bite. He’s a known troll.

Re-read my post and compare our both statements.

Where is your Cause?

None whatsoever.

>>>>>In other word, you are TheTroll<>>>>

Reversal doesn’t work in the art of trolling.

And……………where your Cause?

None

Whatsoever!

My cause is to point out fallacies.

Than the OP Factual Evidence and countless Factial Evidence since the begining of the gw2 forum, were all “Fallacy”?

As the saying goes, “In-denial is the Fall of Man”

Lastly, “Never argue with one who’s In-denial, if you do, you will become 1One with him”

End of argument.

That response made me laugh.