Who thinks the Greatsaw Greatsword skin got too much attention?
in Thief
Posted by: Sartorial Zodiac.2560
(edited by Sartorial Zodiac.2560)
in Thief
Posted by: Sartorial Zodiac.2560
Who thinks the greatsword skin got too much attention while our dagger skin looks like a joke?
Even if you take a look at legendary weapons the greatswords looks way better than most other legendary weapons.
Why not add severed arms to the greatsword??
I think its unfair that they put in so much effort into designing greatswords and shields in this game and ignore the rest. I thought at least this event I would get a decent dagger skin but was really disappointed : (
(edited by Sartorial Zodiac.2560)
I honestly think it looked terrible and the hype was really overinflated, but that’s just me. Why is this in the Thief forum?
in Thief
Posted by: Sartorial Zodiac.2560
Why should it not be in the thief forum?
Because it has nothing to do with the thief profession?
I like the scythe more, would be epic to see a necromancer running around with that.
in Thief
Posted by: Sartorial Zodiac.2560
WillOfIron.5273
Because it has nothing to do with the thief profession?
I’m guessing you don’t use daggers? what do you use then? and have you seen the Halloween dagger skin?
I am curious to know what thieves think about this skin and if any of them would actually consider transmuting this skin to their daggers.
(edited by Sartorial Zodiac.2560)
sadly, just like other 95% of armor and weapons skins, i stopped caring about this one after i got first look on it
Godskull kris is best dagger skin hands down followed by aureate dirk. And even those could use some work :P
I think greatsaw got the most loving. Chain sword/dagger/shield looked meh. sure the scythe got a lot of hype since well its a scythe and the other staff looks lil meh as well. But sword/dagger got it worse and hammer/axe/rifle didnt get anything right?
Its just like the legendaries, Sunrise and Twilight look so detailed and epic whereas Incinerator looks so ordinary compared to those 2. Another example of how Anet only cares about warriors.
That’s why I’m farming for the Dreamer, not the Incinerator.
That, and I know I’ll be using the Shortbow for a long, long time to come. Daggers may easily end up nerfed.
Anyone know what the leg pistol look like?
There’s a video of the Quip on youtube. But seriously, if u have it equiped, no one will take u seriously, its shoots streamers and balloons, a weapon for a clown.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IKl0_iPyUQ
in Thief
Posted by: ArchNemesis.4897
Although i can imagine it’d be funny spanking someone in WvW with that gun…
Not a weapon for me though. I find it ridiculous how biased things are towards Warriors sometimes…
in Thief
Posted by: Badsituation.6125
Its just like the legendaries, Sunrise and Twilight look so detailed and epic whereas Incinerator looks so ordinary compared to those 2. Another example of how Anet only cares about warriors.
While i agree some legendaries didn’t get the attention of others it’s a bit silly to say that “anet only cares about warriors”. I mean really, how much sense does that make ? Can someone break down this logic to me because i’ve heard it mentioned a few times.
Because warrior is so far the only proffesion to be clearly stated to be played by devs, the only proffesion that devs stated to be balanced and by the fact that everything about looks and usability is only applied fully to warriors now.
Would actually be ok if the legendary weapons were all “joke” skins with streamers and rainbows, but then why give 1 class an amazing piece of work that makes the world stare forever.. I mean cmon greatsword to say anything especially like the poor ppl who play main with axe or scepter. I realize cosmetics are diff from person to person but thats just not a comparison..
Not affiliated with ArenaNet or NCSOFT. No support is provided.
All assets, page layout, visual style belong to ArenaNet and are used solely to replicate the original design and preserve the original look and feel.
Contact /u/e-scrape-artist on reddit if you encounter a bug.