Axe/Axe or Axe/Mace?

Axe/Axe or Axe/Mace?

in Warrior

Posted by: Zylonite.5913

Zylonite.5913

I am just wondering why everyone is suggesting Axe/Mace instead of Axe/Axe for 30/25/0/0/15 traits? What is special about the mace?

Betrayed by the gods of ANet

Axe/Axe or Axe/Mace?

in Warrior

Posted by: jeatsen.2378

jeatsen.2378

mace #4 has invul, and #5 has Knockdown.

whereas axe #4 provides fury, which you should already be able to maintain its uptime in a full zerker party, and axe #5 is weaker than the axe auto-attack chain

(edited by jeatsen.2378)

Axe/Axe or Axe/Mace?

in Warrior

Posted by: Olba.5376

Olba.5376

There’s also the fact that the 30/25/0/0/15 that you’re running is an “adrenaline maintain” type build, rather than an “adrenaline use” type build. That is to say that you won’t be using Eviscerate.

That makes Axe #4 rather useless, as you won’t be benefitting from the extra adrenaline gain of the multiple hits. Same is true for Axe #5.

And from a team perspective, the Fury on Axe #4 is wasted because you should already have permanent Fury. Not to mention that in comparison, Mace #4 will always provide 4% overall damage to the whole team.

Axe/Axe or Axe/Mace?

in Warrior

Posted by: Dub.1273

Dub.1273

30/25/0/0/15 isn’t an axe build anyway.

Dub | [rT]
#LoveArrows2013, never forget.