Distracting Strikes - On Immobilize?

Distracting Strikes - On Immobilize?

in Warrior

Posted by: Zefrost.3425

Zefrost.3425

If confusion was applied on immobilize instead of stun, wouldn’t that make this trait immensely more viable because then the actual condition weapons (sword/longbow) can use it without the warrior needing to waste utilities or power weapons?

I cannot see this being overpowered with sword#1 spam and leg specialist. Know why? Because the counter to someone spamming auto attack on you over and over is… well, a lot of counters… How often is someone auto attacking you to death with axe or mace or any other weapon in the game? Yeah, never. So it wouldn’t be overpowered with leg specialist simply because no one gets auto attacked to death, ever (from melee weapons, anyway).

Distracting Strikes - On Immobilize?

in Warrior

Posted by: Ambrecombe.4398

Ambrecombe.4398

I actualy found Distracting Strike to be very usefull with a Sword&Board + Kick + Fear Me condition build. I also used to run a Rifle with Rampager gear, but with the removal of the bleeding stacks on Bleeding Shot it lost a lot of flavour.

Now I agree the Confusion on immobilization would make a lot more sense with the current condition setup. But I feel it would make it way to easy to stack confusion with the multiple source of immobilize you get with the current Warrior tools. Also it would remove the skillcap of that trait which is something I like about it.

Distracting Strikes - On Immobilize?

in Warrior

Posted by: shadowpass.4236

shadowpass.4236

I was a power ranger before it was cool.
Guild Leader of Favorable Winds [Wind]