Exclusion from wvw meta
warrior is not exlucded from wvw meta, is just less relevant, and less decisive. Still warbanners can change the fight.
Or else, play DPS warrior. You will be like a thief burster, but without the stealth.
shoutwar is dead
banner is still there
imobs and stuns are still there.
shoutwar is dead
banner is still there
imobs and stuns are still there.
Why shoutwar is dead? I didn’t follow all the recent changes.
thanks
Hammer/Greatsword trains are still a thing in some WvW guilds. I’ve seen it. Warriors are still viable in WvW in my experience. I don’t think shoutbow ‘dieing’ caused warriors to lose viability. Just lost popularity because the lose of face-rolling might and heals.
shoutwar is dead
banner is still there
imobs and stuns are still there.Why shoutwar is dead? I didn’t follow all the recent changes.
thanks
The heal amount from shouts was dramatically reduced, Warhorn no longer transforms condis to boons.
Old Man Burr (War), Bad Hat Ben (Engi), Manly Manny Manson (Guard)
The heal amount from shouts was dramatically reduced, Warhorn no longer transforms condis to boons.
Thanks
“shoutbow” was never wvw meta, it’s hammer/swordhorn
“shoutbow” was never wvw meta, it’s hammer/swordhorn
Hammer gs is viable. Gs axe shield is viable. Gs lb is viable.
Hammer lb is viable. Mace shield gs is viable.
I… don’t think OP knows what OP is talking about…
“shoutbow” was never wvw meta, it’s hammer/swordhorn
If you mean in zergs you’d most likely see hammer trains with Hammer/S/WH. If you roamed in parties averaging 5 or so then Shoutbow was way more prevalent. If you soloed roam you’d most likely be running neither and some H/GS variant or sword/LB condi build if you’re ballsy. Not a completely invalid statement but not entirely correct either.