Opinion on Rifles?

Opinion on Rifles?

in Warrior

Posted by: kKagari.6804

kKagari.6804

For the most part, I like rifles. The animations are nice, the weapon has some good skills, and is generally fun to use.

What I can’t get past is the auto-attack. The only rifle related trait, Crack Shot, is in the Arms trait line which is for Condition damage and Precision. But the rifle actually lays on conditions very poorly. Bleed is only useful in high stacks, and the auto attack is too slow to be significant. As a weapon for high crit damage the Rifle is actually pretty good.

I can see if someone wants to run a condition damage warrior they might go Sword/whatever and Rifle, with the Rifle being the support weapon, but it kinda limits the viability of the Rifle as a main weapon.

IMO, Rifle1 should stack vulnerability, with Rifle 4 changed to inflict burning. Burning has high base damage and compliments +condition damage nicely. In effect, you’d get a Rifle1 with a useful utility even with its attack speed, and a Rifle4 which is great for complimenting before or after killshots.

“We just don’t want players to grind in GW2” – C. Johanson
“it doesn’t make you spend hours preparing to have fun, rather than having fun”
Guild missions say otherwise.

Opinion on Rifles?

in Warrior

Posted by: Ljiona.9142

Ljiona.9142

Yeah, but those bleeds last 9 seconds with an easy to get trait. That is pretty huge. The bleeding rifle is a different style of play. It is slow, but very effective. I rather they not change it. Direct damage glass cannon builds are a dime a dozen.

Opinion on Rifles?

in Warrior

Posted by: Lensar.4920

Lensar.4920

Glass cannon can be fun in WvW, though.

http://youtu.be/eWTQhYDuYYE

Lensar – [End] Rasnel – 80 Warrior
Ascalons Requiem – Blackgate
Public Blackgate WvW Forum: http://bit.ly/X3Bifl