Warriors

Warriors

in Warrior

Posted by: Troll.4237

Troll.4237

Tanky condi war> tanky condi necro

Makes sense to me!

Warriors

in Warrior

Posted by: Amir.1570

Amir.1570

Necro can also condi burst while chain CC’ing, strip boons making it so that you can chain CC without waiting for stability to go off, and have at least 40k HP.

You mad? Mad as in insane?

Warriors

in Warrior

Posted by: Mightymealworm.8409

Mightymealworm.8409

More tanky heavy armor tough guy vs. More condi robe wearing magical emo guy? Yup, it does make sense.

Warriors

in Warrior

Posted by: Troll.4237

Troll.4237

My point is that a class that is not based on condis shouldn’t be able to cream a class that a based around condis… Lol, why did I even bother posting here. You guys will always say your not op and keep asking for buffs until you can 1v5 with ease.

Warriors

in Warrior

Posted by: Carpboy.7145

Carpboy.7145

My point is that a class that is not based on condis shouldn’t be able to cream a class that a based around condis… Lol, why did I even bother posting here. You guys will always say your not op and keep asking for buffs until you can 1v5 with ease.

So in that statement you say nothing but a necro should be able to beat a necro?

Its funny because id love to be able to passively apply burn, have tons of fears (which also deals more damage than burning), and then when ive got one person loaded up be able to spread it all with a single button. Grass is always greener i guess?


The Use of the Word ‘Cheese’
Lyss The Shadow
Legendary Champion of DB [EDGE]

Warriors

in Warrior

Posted by: Mightymealworm.8409

Mightymealworm.8409

My point is that a class that is not based on condis shouldn’t be able to cream a class that a based around condis… Lol, why did I even bother posting here. You guys will always say your not op and keep asking for buffs until you can 1v5 with ease.

Well honestly, you never specified that in your original post. No idea if you were discussing pve, wvw, spvp, tpvp, 1vs1 etc… Yes, warriors are strong vs condi necros, but thats mostly because warriors mix condi with power, and have crazy condi removal/mitigation. Pretty sure warrior 2.0 was designed to counter condi necro.

Warriors

in Warrior

Posted by: korelg.7862

korelg.7862

thi is dumb, there are no “condition classes”, that’s the good thing about GW2, you can play condi or direct damage with any class… except guardians, guardians cant play condi

Warriors

in Warrior

Posted by: P Fun Daddy.1208

P Fun Daddy.1208

thi is dumb, there are no “condition classes”, that’s the good thing about GW2, you can play condi or direct damage with any class… except guardians, guardians cant play condi

Or elementalists really

Warriors

in Warrior

Posted by: Drarnor Kunoram.5180

Drarnor Kunoram.5180

thi is dumb, there are no “condition classes”, that’s the good thing about GW2, you can play condi or direct damage with any class… except guardians, guardians cant play condi

And necros really can’t play anything but. Even the power builds have heavy reliance on conditions, just not bleeding, burning, and Torment (poison is still useful for mitigating heals).

Dragonbrand |Drarnor Kunoram: Charr Necro
http://www.twitch.tv/reverse830
I’m a Geeleiver

Warriors

in Warrior

Posted by: Flissy.4093

Flissy.4093

OPs name is perfectly suited.

If a condition bunker Necro loses to a condition bunker Warrior, they were so outmatched as Necro has the advantage in that encounter by default.

Bads will be bads, then whine about not being bad and X being OP instead. MMOs in a nutshell.

Light Up the Darkness
“Dear ANet, nerf Paper, Scissors is fine. Sincerely, Rock”
Elysaurus | Warrior | [LOL] | League of the Legendary | Gandara (EU)

Warriors

in Warrior

Posted by: Carpboy.7145

Carpboy.7145


The Use of the Word ‘Cheese’
Lyss The Shadow
Legendary Champion of DB [EDGE]