a different point of view on warriors

a different point of view on warriors

in Warrior

Posted by: PierPiero.9142

PierPiero.9142

I don’t play warrior, but i tried one. I play pve and mists (wvw) is boring for me and i play guardian or elementalist and rarely thief.
I find warrior one of the stronger class of the game but i prefer fight a warrior (the same for thief in some ways) rather than many other professions .
I am not a skilled player on my profession and take down a warrior is really hard (with guardian very hard but sometime i guess it, with elementalist for me near impossible ) .
the problem of warrior is that there is many many people who leveled up a warrior or thief thinking of being OP, they stand up and don’t dodge and so you have more probability to fight a not good player.
For example i find very difficult to fight engeneer … becouse people who choose engi wants really to learn it and they know they did not choose the simple way … so many of them are strong players. A strong warrior is quite impossible to fight alone …

a different point of view on warriors

in Warrior

Posted by: Red Falcon.8257

Red Falcon.8257

A class is as strong as the player behind it.
Some are easier to be average with, but all are hard to be extremely good with.
Warrior is not really different – perhaps more suited for people with a playsytle oriented toward offensive fast-paced counterplay.

The main thing is learning what a class is really good at, I.E. a Guardian is really good at holding a point so you shouldn’t try to beat it akittens own game but rather exploit its weaknesses (i.e. poison, lack of disengages, boon stripping).

In this case, if you face a Warrior you know he has great mobility and damage so you shouldn’t try to out-damage it or out-run it – rather, play attrition and control.