Guild Wars 2

I decided that I will make this topic every week until Arena net decides to answer. If you don’t like it, just ban me, I don’t really care.

I still play games like this and it really makes me angry:

https://www.copy.com/s/9QuBT7YymmHLOW3y/1.PNG
https://www.copy.com/s/zckN33Osox1Hj14q/3.PNG
https://www.copy.com/s/7X2fny6jtO2Klpb9/2.PNG

How much longer do you think that players patience can take this? Don’t tell me that people think that this is amazing pvp system.

Why aren’t you implanting pvp level in to the matchmaking? Do you really think that rank 50 has the same experience as rank 10 even if they are both 90%?

And the serious question. What are you going to do about this leaderboards (which is only saying who is playing soloQ and who is playing premade) and matchmaking? This really isn’t working and I really doubt that more than 5% of players like it. This is just stupid system that will make people leave the pvp (sooner or later).

It would be really awesome if you’d take 30 minutes of your precious time and wrote something about what are you gonna do about tpvp… Because this way you will really lose pvp base…

The system is fine.

If a rank 10 is in the 90% bracket, then they’re going to be the same skill level as a rank 58.

I was rank 38 when I killed someone without even trying who was rank 60+

Chase.8415:

The system is fine.

If a rank 10 is in the 90% bracket, then they’re going to be the same skill level as a rank 58.

I was rank 38 when I killed someone without even trying who was rank 60+

That means nothing, if all the stuff about build match-up is true.

Um, those aren’t bad games, except for the 4v5 most likely 5v5 with a rage quitter.

The image below is a bad matchmaking game.
1. The developers shouldn’t consider rank 1s in 90% of leaderboards.
2. The game failed to equally distribute everyones rank, as in one team is stacked with very very low rank.
3. Those low ranks were no chance in hell some high rank starting a new account, they got obliterated all of them.
4. That was a 90% rated leaderboard match.

Chase.8415:

The system is fine.

If a rank 10 is in the 90% bracket, then they’re going to be the same skill level as a rank 58.

I was rank 38 when I killed someone without even trying who was rank 60+

A rank 10 could solo queue for his first tourney and be placed on a premade team where he’d get carried, win his 1st game, and depending on his opponents he could be ranked significantly higher than 90%. In game rank is synonymous with play time and experience. If you don’t find it significantly easier to kill a rank 20 or below as opposed to a rank 50 or above then you’re playing against the few bad 50+ people who got their rank through hotjoins. I’d still rather have them on my team than the rank 10 :P.

Or veteran player gets another account and wins all matches but its still at glory rank 1 but scales up on leaderboards. Glory ranks dont tell anything (except that you played that account for x amount of time).

they need to show the ratings instead of the glory rank.