Guild Wars 2

We lost. 350-500. My team was un-carryable other team had 3 players above 200 points.

Ty A-net for resetting me at bottom of LB!

Jin

Necro’s and warrior are balanced Kappa

no need for hasty changes.

warrior necro meta lmao.

#4signets. passive play 4 the win.

Because Balance (Kappa). So, when will the Balance team get fired?

^inb4 this post gets deleted.

Hilarious profession representation indeed. To be honest though, I’m really not surprised the side with 3 necros got pooped on. That’s a terrible comp to face 2+ power CC builds.

Other than that, though, what are you really sarcastically thanking A-Net for?

From a 350-500 match it’s obvious that you weren’t getting steamrolled and spawn camped every single fight. You should be making a sarcastic thank-you thread to A-net if you’re winning 500-0 or losing 0-500.

Judging from what information I have available it seems the SoloQ system in your case has worked fine, and the better team won?

I mean, I wish the system could guarantee every game would be 500-499, but whether the players are on their game or not is a huge variable. Savor the 350-500 games, they’re far from the worst..

JinDaVikk.7291:

We lost. 350-500. My team was un-carryable other team had 3 players above 200 points.

Ty A-net for resetting me at bottom of LB!

Jin

350-500 on Legacy of the Foefire is a normal score given that the difference is just a lord kill (150 points). If you’ve watched any of the tournaments that have been broadcast, you’d know that even matches between the best teams on NA/EU end up with scores like that since one mistake on either team’s part can result in a 100+ point difference on that map.

When you get steamrolled 500-10, or 500-0, come back and post your sarcastic thread.

What’s the line all the Necros keep posting on the forums?

“We’re not in a condition meta”

…

Ezrael.6859:

What’s the line all the Necros keep posting on the forums?

“We’re not in a condition meta”

…

We’re not in a condition Meta.. we’re in a ‘low risk’ meta.

Tanky Support Guard. Clerics Amulet.

Tanky Hambow Warrior x2. Soldier’s Amulet.

Un-Focusable S/D Thief (Until Dec.10th).

Tanky Spirit Ranger. Settlers Amulet.

^This is the face of the current ‘low risk’ meta, in competitive tPvP.

The next popular professions in descending order:

Right now it’s not as favorable for trainable Necromancers, but very do-able of course, Necromancers are still chock full of amazingly broken goodness making them a popular secondary choice. You can run Engineer if you are, mechanically, a good player at escaping death – or become proficient at being the zerg target while running a Tanky Engineer. Engies are in a pretty balanced spot right now. Mesmers are not in a favorable position either, but do-able if you can find some way to deal with the S/D Thief. You currently can’t run Ele and get away with it. Between the S/D Thief and the Warrior Pin Downs, your Ele’s butt is done like dinner.

So yeah, there isn’t much of a bias towards condition damage as implied by a ‘condition meta’. That meta died when Hambow warriors started replacing some of the double Necros and double Spirit Ranger comps.

It’s all about playing a super safe build that nobody can easily train, while punishing the teams that don’t conform to this rule. IE: Train the Necro/Mesmer/Ele/Engi to the ends of the earth!!!!!!!!

Dat team balance

RoRo.8270:

Dat team balance

Sounds like troll comps.

Sure sign of a troll comp

• 1) Top right image – the team with 4 Warriors gets demolished 55-500
• 2) Bottom left image – the team with 5 Thieves and lots of kills loses 485-500.

Dey see we trollin’ .. dey postin .. the pics on .. threads in the sPvP forum

RoRo.8270:

Dat team balance

Funny how Full warrior+thief team lost to 4 player team at 60-500 Wars op right ?

This pic needs be sent to nerf team before patch asap.Since only 1 war in team was supposed to win the match by himself anyway right?Acording to these forums

Because it’s not at all possible that one of the players on the blue team immediately left when the match finished, before the screenshot was taken.

Nope, not possible at all mini.6018 who just happens to play a FOTM Warrior (albeit badly) and is a massive Warrior state of balance apologist.

Ezrael.6859:

Because it’s not at all possible that one of the players on the blue team immediately left when the match finished, before the screenshot was taken.

Nope, not possible at all mini.6018 who just happens to play a FOTM Warrior (albeit badly) and is a massive Warrior state of balance apologist.

Good catch forgot to mention that wasn’t quick enough taking the ss

Ezrael.6859:

Because it’s not at all possible that one of the players on the blue team immediately left when the match finished, before the screenshot was taken.

Nope, not possible at all mini.6018 who just happens to play a FOTM Warrior (albeit badly) and is a massive Warrior state of balance apologist.

I play zerker amy mace/sword longbow no points in arms build .Guess the fotm changed ?Oww you must be one of THOSE .Regardless ,that is the reason i don’t even need to be good to deal with you.Hint:you die to terrible build bro.

5 ppl can’t outdps one single healsig.Albeit 4?Physical plane cracked?The universe has already started to implode after this paradox

I never thought that I’ll come to this forum to whine. I abandoned soloq some time ago because they were ridiculous unbalanced.
Now after the reset and so many changes I wanted to give it a chance once more. So my first 2 games yesterday was 4 vs 5. I get down to 7 % ! xDDD

I think I’ll just stay on team q with friends. Because the solo q is unplayable for me and I’m laughing so hard with each 4 vs 5 game or ppl on rank 1 playing on my team when I’m 40 atm.
Thats hilarious ! ! ! ^^

RoRo.8270:

Dat team balance

may i contunue

i think we could use more warriors, why am i still playing thief kitten it

Chaith.8256:

Dey see we trollin’ .. dey postin .. the pics on .. threads in the sPvP forum

Quote of the week.