new terms of service question
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/support/account/License-Agreement/first#post1706206
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/support/account/License-Agreement/first#post1707599
The section you mention has been in the UA since Guild Wars was released in 2005. In my opinion, you are not eligible for a refund for an unchanged UA.
Communications Manager
Guild & Fansite Relations; In-Game Events
ArenaNet
(edited by Gaile Gray.6029)
That clause also covers them charging for an expansion later on if they go that route.
That clause also covers them charging for an expansion later on if they go that route.
Expansions generally do have a cost. Added content or features generally do not. We charged for Factions, Nightfall, and Eye of the North. Nothing new there. I don’t know that the clause is specifically addressing expansion, but I do know it’s been around forever… and causes someone to get concerned every time we update the UA, even though we don’t add or change that section.
Communications Manager
Guild & Fansite Relations; In-Game Events
ArenaNet
I don’t see the problem, unless ANET starts actually charging a sub fee and you bought the game the week (or even being generous the month) that happens you ought to have more than got your moneys worth (assuming you dont play the oft ill treated ranger class that is) and can just not subscribe if you don’t want to.
That clause also covers them charging for an expansion later on if they go that route.
Expansions generally do have a cost. Added content or features generally do not. We charged for Factions, Nightfall, and Eye of the North. Nothing new there. I don’t know that the clause is specifically addressing expansion, but I do know it’s been around forever… and causes someone to get concerned every time we update the UA, even though we don’t add or change that section.
Just look at it this way Gaile, at least it means that people are reading the UA, and your legal team’s time has not been entirely wasted
An Officer and a Gentlewoman