Message for Arena Net.
Today again the same problem, in big battles i have lots of lag with my skills.. the screen is ok, i have no problem with that. but when i want to press my support skills nothing happends.
You can ignore me ArenaNet, thats very nice but i really have looked other forum posts and none have a serious reply from the game administration. You guys like to give me infractions when i talk “Bad” About the game, but i just want an anwser if this is a server problem and if you as a serious company are working on a fix, or not.
A game company that claims to have the ‘best’ in the industry can handle the negative feedback too right?
So i ask once again, not want to annoy or make you guys mad..
Are you guys aware of the skillag in WvW and on the big Boss fights in PVE?
I honestly dont think its about anet as a whole not being able to deal with critisism or people complaining so much as some users and staff not being able to deal with it.
there are some major White Knights here who report any thread or post they see that says anything negative about the game/anet, and there is at least 1 staff member who is VERY fast to infract and lock/delete anything they see that makes anet look bad.
look at the lousy fps thread that got renamed then locked….for being “inflammatory” when nobody was even fighting/flaming…….
dont be shocked if you get an infraction for posts that arent pro anet, and dont be shocked when posts are edited or flat out deleted, this realms gods are quite capricious and uneven in their dealings with us poor mortals.
PCP&C 1200watt TC, Crosshair V F-Z, Sapphire 290x
Well i just want a reply on my problem. If i buy a toaster and it burns only 1 side, and i go back to the shop to ask if i do something wrong.. or if its a faulty product, then i hope i get a reply.. or i wont buy anymore goods from that shop.
Thats how i think about this product now too.
good choice, nobody i know will be buying any more gems or the expantion at this point, we have all agreed we are waiting for neverwinter then, when ESO comes out, thats likely where we will land(prob play both though)
honestly, I dont know more then to tell you its a one in 10million shot anet will even acknowledge this post let alone have an answer for you…they really just dont seem to care from what i can tell…….
PCP&C 1200watt TC, Crosshair V F-Z, Sapphire 290x
Or you can flip the bread to burn the other side
That will save you a trip to the shop with all those high petrol prices…
I understand why you are dissapointed, but i have this problem too.. this is the best MMORPG i ever played, and i want to stay in it for atleast a very long time! not to leave it within a year.. i really like this game alot! But the punishments i get from asking about the game are way too fierce!
I just want too know if its going to be fixed to have too look something forward too.
If its not, i try to go in re-hab and leave the game.
No i am not turning my own breads
the best answer any of us can give you is, dont expect a fix till the xbox720/ps4 come out, thats the only thing I see driving anet to fix the games threading and performance, and quite likely they will launch some kind of expantion around that time for PC users to buy that will have dx11 support.
http://tamrielfoundry.com/2013/03/interview-dan-dunham/
read that, and ask, why anet didnt build gw2 using the same principles….(scaling with hardware, testing with lots of people on screen at once…exct)
PCP&C 1200watt TC, Crosshair V F-Z, Sapphire 290x
Well i dont understand why they have build this game on DX9! DX11 is known for sending information in a smaller size to the game client.
Thats why other games are using the DX10,11 Engine.. using the DX9 engine is a good idea! IF u are making a single player game ( admit it, the PVE looks amazing )
thats easy, the games desing screams that they planned a console port.
it uses 3 heavy threads, the xbox360 has 3 cores
it uses dx9 the 360 uses dx9 level hardware and a very similar API to dx9.
the skill setup also screams console, look at how many buttons are on the xbox controllers and then how many skills/hotkeys you really need in game.
they abandoned such a port clearly, and I think its easy to see why, the games far far far to heavy for the 360’s 3.6ghz tricore powerpc processor, hell
http://pcpartpicker.com/p/Ka11
that system clocked to 5ghz couldnt guarntee you a min of 60fps at 1080p…..
you will see dx11 when the 720/ps4 drop, both are dx11, 8 core, and both are 64bit, so its possible we would see a 64bit client as well….
till then, anet arent gonna bother, they have made it pretty kitten clear that unless theres money to be made, its not important enough to give much effort to….
look at the announcements, not one in 6 months about fixing the performance of the game, culling mentioned but not alot, most of the “improvements” for the game have been stuff like hair changes/sex changes/quagan backpacks…..
to many of us this is a clear sign of what anets top priority is, and the fact that we get infracted/banned for talking about it, and threads get locked for talking about it, posts edited, exct……clear sign that at least some people at anet do not want us talking about these issues because they dont want anybody thinking of buying the game to know till its to late…..
after all, fixing the problem would cost more then ignoring it and paying somebody to cover it up.
I wont be surprised if this posts is edited/deleted and im infracted/banned, after all, im not sticking to the line that all the perf issues are client side issues not on anets end..
PCP&C 1200watt TC, Crosshair V F-Z, Sapphire 290x
Well i dont understand why they have build this game on DX9! DX11 is known for sending information in a smaller size to the game client.
There are still plenty of people who still think Windows XP is the master OS, and refuse to upgrade. XP only can do up to DirectX 9. Because Vista, 7, 8, and variants of those OS’s can also do DirectX 9, it only makes sense to use DirectX 9 to attempt to support a larger pool of people, especially for a MMORPG.
With that said though, a choice for DX9 and DX11 would be nice, but this would require further development time. It might happen eventually, who knows.
I personally think OpenGL is “master renderer”, but barely any other developer thinks so apparently :/
it makes zero sense with a game like gw2 to support XP,
1. most xp systems are to old to run this game, despite the min specs they post, the game runs like crap on systems from the xp era.
2. xp is EOL and even hardware makers are cutting support for newer devices under xp now.
3. xp 32bit(the xp 99.9999999999999999999999% of xp users have) can only deal with around 3gb ram, the problem here is that the game can use more then that, even anet have suggested people get 64bit windows to fix memory related crashes with the game…
opengl is a pain in the kitten because nVidia and AMD and Intel dont support the same vendor specific extentions, also intels ogl renderer sucks donky dong from my exp……
amd and nv have decent ogl support under windows but…intel….the most common gfx chip in POS systems…..not so much.
the big problem is, gw2 is to cpu dependant to run well on a system that would have shipped with XP.
hell its to cpu dependant for most vista and 7 and 8 systems….
they didnt go with dx9 just because it would sell a few more copy’s they had announced dx10 and even later dx11 would be in the game at launch, but abandoned that, I think around the time the big console push happened internally at anet.
go read past interviews and statements from the dev’s, the more you read the more clear it becomes as to why they went dx9 and 3 heavy threads….somebody in management saw $.$ at the idea of a console port…
and, if your still using xp with a game system today, your either an idiot or…..a total idiot…..only thing more idiotic would be to try and run the game on linux……(you really gotta be a masochist to be a “linux gamer”….)
sorry this is how i feel, I mean, I avoided vista(used server 2008 as a workstation though…..) but vista when it launched suffered from kitten poor driver support as well as alot of little internal bugs…..it also suffered from oem’s selling systems with 1/2 or less ram then the os really needed to function properly…..
people still using xp who call themselves gamers, are idiots…..I know a couple, they use XP because it nets them a few extra points in 3dmark and other synthetics….they arent really gamers they are benchers…..they hate me saying that though…..
so yeah, greed is why they went dx9…….got them some game sales to people whos systems enlarge cant run the game well enough to do the main selling points(de’s and wvwvw) and they had hoped it would allow for a console port so they could suck in all those console kiddies….to bad….i bet alot of xp users have asked for refunds…..those that realised they could ask for a refund anyway…
again i said, 2012 and dx9…….an api thats 10 years old at the time…..only excuse is the port and greed…..shocked they didnt also support dx8 and windows 9x/me….after all some people playing gw1 still use them!!!!
PCP&C 1200watt TC, Crosshair V F-Z, Sapphire 290x
and, if your still using xp with a game system today, your either an idiot or…..a total idiot…..only thing more idiotic would be to try and run the game on linux……(you really gotta be a masochist to be a “linux gamer”….)
sorry this is how i feel, I mean, I avoided vista(used server 2008 as a workstation though…..) but vista when it launched suffered from kitten poor driver support as well as alot of little internal bugs…..it also suffered from oem’s selling systems with 1/2 or less ram then the os really needed to function properly…..
people still using xp who call themselves gamers, are idiots…..I know a couple, they use XP because it nets them a few extra points in 3dmark and other synthetics….they arent really gamers they are benchers…..they hate me saying that though…..
To be fair, I used to have an old computer that ran games better under XP, instead of Vista or 7. Drivers under XP in most cases are Kernel-mode, and have direct access to the hardware, thus meaning better performance (either minor in good computers, or major in lower-end computers). This was a few years ago. The only thing I would fine XP good for is running it under virtualization and playing games like that (XP is lighter than Vista+, and runs games; why use some heavier OS in this situation?).
XP still has its use today, but if you can do the same stuff in an actual actively supported OS with no disadvantage, why not use such an OS?
As for Linux, it’s not “that” bad for gaming at all; just depends on what games your trying to play of course. Some work fine, some have minor issues, others are broken beyond belief, and the status of games can change easily too. Such an environment isn’t too welcoming for anyone just wanting to play all their Windows-based games with no issues whatsoever, but it is getting better.
I’d love to be running Linux right now if it weren’t for two games not working “too” well, GW2 being one.
lol I would love to see someone play GW2 in XP VM ware then go to WvW and after that Jorlag! That would be awesome!
I am really looking forward to an attempt to try to play wvw after the next patch.
intel 335 180gb/intel 320 160gb WD 3TB Gigabyte GTX G1 970 XFX XXX750W HAF 932
Espionage.3685: interesting, I have tested 7 vs xp on a large slew of systems, and if the system has 1-1.5gb ram I have yet to find a case where 7 wasnt as fast or faster even for older games.
some examples.
duron 600@866 with 1.5gb pc133 sdram and a dx9 videocard(ati something or other), xp was SLOWER, I didnt expect that, but it was…..(and yes finding 512mb pc133 sticks was a challange, but, the guy i got them from had bought them as an ill considered upgrade for a P4 system he had(that funny enough, wouldnt see them as larger then 256mb due to it not liking high density ram…ROFL)
I have also tested on p4/p-d/classic athlon/athlon xp/athlon64 first gen(754 and 940), core2(celeron-quad), even pentium3(i had a p3 1.4ghz with 1.5gb ddr i got in a trade)…..
thats not the full list just the older ones….
Vista is a bit more of a mixed bag, if you got the ram to run it, and install a patched up version, it will run very much like 7 on the same hardware, thanks to the fact they have vista/7 drivers sorted.
windows 8, im avoiding, I see no point at this time in buying it, i dont like “modern”(the start screen), its not any faster in my personal testing then 7, the few features i really like in 8 are possible in 7 using freeware apps…..and no worries about app/game compatibility issues my friends running 8 all have run across.
xp x64 is a decent os, but its not really xp, its server 2003 x64 in “pro” mode, server 2003 is what xp should have been…..
Again, I say anybody running xp on a modern game rig=id10t error
PCP&C 1200watt TC, Crosshair V F-Z, Sapphire 290x
lol I would love to see someone play GW2 in XP VM ware then go to WvW and after that Jorlag! That would be awesome!
I am really looking forward to an attempt to try to play wvw after the next patch.
I have setup virtualbox and vmware for a few people with 2000 or xp installed for playing some legacy titles that dont like newer windows versions(they can be made to work but its a hassle and they run well under hardware vitalized vm’s)
jorlag….they should change the name to that officially :P
PCP&C 1200watt TC, Crosshair V F-Z, Sapphire 290x
That is your personal opinion… It’s not because people use xp that they are flagged as ‘id10t’. The reason why they still use xp, is because it don’t need 2 Gb ram to run like windows 7 does. It’s fast, and light.
But it looks like you lived 100 year, and are a guru of all the systems imaginable on earth, so I can’t tell you if you are right or wrong. Windows 8 is as good as the windows 7 or windows xp for those who use it. It’s just a personal preference, you can’t judge people who use this and that. Why do you have 32gb ram in your computer ? It’s just to compensate what windows 7 use and keep some fair big amount to do other stuff.
(Anyway 32 is overkill and ‘id10t’ in my eyes too) But we can’t judge you of what you have. From all the post you said, it looks like you are a reference point that everyone else here must follow… It’s not because you have a pc of 3000$, that ours are crap and idiotic…
actually, WinXP owns Win7 in terms of gaming power. the FPS difference is game-dependent, but often a 2-digit number
i’m surprised too.
but Win7 owns WinXP in terms of multi-core utilization.
so, in case that you’re often running programs, which are capable of utilizing your 4 cores efficiently, Win7 is your friend.
anyways, i kinda miss WinXP, but i’m glad i moved on to Win7. it’s superior in many ways and not nearly as bugged as it’s predecessors.
wow…i’ve let myself getting sucked into that religious battle.
“Only the finest of potatoes in my zerkburgers.”
Today again, just a small group of Viz were attacking our tower.. i needed endure pain to get in the tower without getting any damage and the skill didnt work! You see its beeing pressed but it wont activate!
As a customer i really want some information about this please! Will this stay? I have not seen any official response on this problem and i am sure alot of people would like some feedback about this ‘gamebreaking’ problem.
Everytime this happends i am getting frustrated! And isnt a game suppose to be fun and relaxing? For me its pressing exit game everytime this happends.
Espionage.3685: interesting, I have tested 7 vs xp on a large slew of systems, and if the system has 1-1.5gb ram I have yet to find a case where 7 wasnt as fast or faster even for older games.
You need to try it on a Acer TravelMate 2480 then with 2GB of RAM (my old laptop) :p
If I can recall the specs, it had an Intel Celeron M @ 1.6GHz, 2GB (2×1GB) DDR2 RAM, Intel 950GMA.
That is your personal opinion… It’s not because people use xp that they are flagged as ‘id10t’. The reason why they still use xp, is because it don’t need 2 Gb ram to run like windows 7 does. It’s fast, and light.
But it looks like you lived 100 year, and are a guru of all the systems imaginable on earth, so I can’t tell you if you are right or wrong. Windows 8 is as good as the windows 7 or windows xp for those who use it. It’s just a personal preference, you can’t judge people who use this and that. Why do you have 32gb ram in your computer ? It’s just to compensate what windows 7 use and keep some fair big amount to do other stuff.
I dont need 32gb, but at 109.99 usd shipped, i couldnt pass it up, and it allows me to give my games drive a 24gb cache with 8gb for windows and games to use directly, meaning, my load/launch times for games smokes yours even if you have a top end ssd.
again, had you read what i said, you would know i have tested 7 on alot of hardware vs xp my findings are quite contrary to yours…
(Anyway 32 is overkill and ‘id10t’ in my eyes too)
yup, 109.99 for 32gb of 1866 ram was an id10t move, i regret it so much, that i wish i had bought a few more kits to sell to friends……
But we can’t judge you of what you have. From all the post you said, it looks like you are a reference point that everyone else here must follow… It’s not because you have a pc of 3000$, that ours are crap and idiotic…
my pc was well under 3k, and its been a slow progression, I buy as i get good deals
examples
board 74.10
ram 109.99
psu 95.00
videocards 209.99×2
cpu 189.99
cooler 64.98
case 109.99
by my math thats 1064.03, and it was spent over an extended time.
progression with this board was 1055t with 8gb ddr3 1600, then 16gb ddr3 1600, then this 32gb kit, the first kit i had from a previous build(and its back in that board again) the 2nd kit was 64usd on newegg shellshocker.
I have a 2nd sabertooth 990fx i paid 109.99 for on geeks.com with my 8120(that replaced the 1055).
you seem to be under the impression that i have alot of money, i dont, but, I also am not a cheap kitten who will try and use ancient hardware to play modern games then complain they run poorly, im also not to cheap to buy technet every few years….
actually, WinXP owns Win7 in terms of gaming power. the FPS difference is game-dependent, but often a 2-digit number
i’m surprised too.
thats a crock of what the kitten left in the litter box, the ONLY place I have seen any benefit to sticking to xp was on very old slow systems that really shouldnt be used for gaming today…..and even then…..if its that old, I would stick vector on it so i wouldnt have to suffer with buggy slow xp.
but Win7 owns WinXP in terms of multi-core utilization.
so, in case that you’re often running programs, which are capable of utilizing your 4 cores efficiently, Win7 is your friend.
7 has a better secduler and better optimizations for modern cpu’s then xp, and note, i have 8 cores :P
anyways, i kinda miss WinXP, but i’m glad i moved on to Win7. it’s superior in many ways and not nearly as bugged as it’s predecessors.
if you miss xp UI, then grab windowblinds and use the xp theme…..I do not miss the “fisher price my first pc” luna ui at all….infact i was in the xp beta…..i was the guy who coined that phrase (in quotes) funny enough it spread after release….lol
[qoute]wow…i’ve let myself getting sucked into that religious battle.[/quote]
some people are stuck in the past, I have one guy I use to game with who to this day insists that if windows 98se had drivers for modern hardware he would use it because it was faster….but he also thinks it could use more then 1 core…..sooo…..LOL
Espionage.3685: interesting, I have tested 7 vs xp on a large slew of systems, and if the system has 1-1.5gb ram I have yet to find a case where 7 wasnt as fast or faster even for older games.
You need to try it on a Acer TravelMate 2480 then with 2GB of RAM (my old laptop) :p
If I can recall the specs, it had an Intel Celeron M @ 1.6GHz, 2GB (2×1GB) DDR2 RAM, Intel 950GMA.
could be you needed proper drivers not the acer ones, could also be that the celeron m like all celerons is a slow pos…but would shock me if it was slower then that duron….then again the duron did have better then intel GMA for video….
one thing to note: with laptops, it can be a chore to find all the proper drivers updated, drivermax is worth a look in those cases……
PCP&C 1200watt TC, Crosshair V F-Z, Sapphire 290x
“drivermax is worth a look in those cases……”
I really don’t like ANY of the popular driver updating software. However, after much searching, I FINALLY found a really great one – and it’s free! (BIG download but handy):
http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/System-Miscellaneous/DriverPack-Solution-Professional.kittenml
Main site:
(edited by abomally.2694)
that link wont work(top one), the kitten filter got you…..lol
and drivermax ui sucks, and it sucks you can only do 2 updates a day, but, i have tried a stack, and will look at the one you linked….but havent found one thats as good or better then driver max….even of ones where premium accts cost 2x as much.
dosnt look like this updates drives the same way drivermax does….humm
PCP&C 1200watt TC, Crosshair V F-Z, Sapphire 290x
Lol…I didn’t catch that kitten. Change kittenml to s html without a space.
I’ve tested that program on several machines (XP, Vista, 7 32 and 64 bit) and it works very well. Yes, sometimes you have to download and manually install a driver. However, it’s all pretty-much contained on a DVD – makes new Windows installs much easier.
could be you needed proper drivers not the acer ones, could also be that the celeron m like all celerons is a slow pos…but would shock me if it was slower then that duron….then again the duron did have better then intel GMA for video….
one thing to note: with laptops, it can be a chore to find all the proper drivers updated, drivermax is worth a look in those cases……
Na, I’ve used proper drivers, Acer drivers, modified drivers, pretty much any kind of drivers that were available at the time. Had little to no effect on performance for the most part. Even my HP DC5750 has better performance under XP instead of 7. I’ve heard from numerous people with similar hardware that they too had better experiences in XP with certain games.
I tweak my systems pretty heavily also, so it’s not like I just threw the OS’s on the computer and kept it as-is. I even work with a driver modding group (9xxSSF) and have had several people mention better performance under XP. Tweaks or no tweaks, those computers that I own ran XP better than 7. Now my main Desktop, I imagine would show little to no difference with performance.
It all depends on hardware, but a general rule that I’ve seen is, lower-end systems run better with XP. My definition of lower-end might not match someone else’s though.
Also, can’t stand programs that “try” to find drivers automatically. 95% of the time, I do a far better job at finding my own drivers than those “specialized” programs do. That DriverPack thing even sounds like it contains some kind of malware imo (I’m not 100% sure since I can’t be bothered to download it, but the phrase “you can always evaluate the condition of all key indicators of your PC” just throws all kind of red flags…)
(edited by Espionage.3685)
i checked no malware no spyware, infact its opensource, it jsut downloads a bunch of zip files with large driver archives in it.
drivermax can find drivers for stuff that dosnt even have drivers on the manufacturers site (chip maker or device maker), I only use it to find what the latest version of drivers in most of the time, OR to get drivers that are to hard to find manually…its really a handy app, been using it a very long time when needed.
if a system runs xp better then 7, then most likely vector will run even better, and most systems that old and slow also tend to be more for email, homework and video watching then anything else, so vector works great.
duno why you had better perf on xp, guess im just either lieing or delusional though, after all, in my exp, 20+ old clunkers with 1.5gb ram or better and dedicated dx9 or better nv/amd/ati video (or even 6000nvidia/3000 series ati onboard) ran better with 7 then xp, and your saying thats not possible….
mind im talking stock for stock, I nolonger bother with service tweaks or the like, I do some basic stuff but, enlarge, I just leave things as is, because, any time you mess with services and other deep tweaking to boost perf, you risk ending up with a client whos system has weird errors or just wont work as intended(dont get me started on reg tweaks and printers/wireless cards for example)
also, I wasnt talking pure gaming perf, I mean general use, as nobody I know anymore bothers to try and game on an xp level machine, the few who clung to xp gave up on it over a year ago(i mean other then the one dnozel i know who insists on unpatched xp because it gives him better bench scores…he also wont patch 7 because he insists it ruins perf)
xp x64 is a good os, but its not really xp, its server 2003 x64 in “pro” mode, as i said before……and 2003 is what xp should have been, fast, stable, and NO issues with slow rot (any tech/it guy whos been doing this long knows what i mean by rot, hell we use to talk about it on neowin before it became an ms fanboi site when they made ms employees staff)
btw, heres a link to vector http://waa.ai/S4O great distro to keep around for old slow hardware….
its slack based and even the gold/soho builds run great on slow old horrible hardware….
set it up for my uncle on a POS he got free, p4 2.4ghz dell, 1gb slow ddr ram(he got from me) and a SLOW old 30gb hdd, tried to install 2k then xp but neither could detect and install default drivers for any of the 5 OLD kitten nic’s I had, vector got wired and wireless working first try…..had to teach him the basics but, hes quite happy as he just uses it for email and internet stuff(Craigslist mostly)
oh the videocard was a very old shoddy 9250 128mb low profile(with full hight bracket) real POS i tossed in since it was so old no onboard video :P
they love it, him and his gf that is…..keep talking about how wonderful it works…..how its faster then her p3 laptop she bought 2nd hand(his gf is REALLY cheap….despite having had plenty of money….)
meh im gonna go to bed its 1:30am here :S
PCP&C 1200watt TC, Crosshair V F-Z, Sapphire 290x
I dont need 32gb, but at 109.99 usd shipped, i couldnt pass it up, and it allows me to give my games drive a 24gb cache with 8gb for windows and games to use directly, meaning, my load/launch times for games smokes yours even if you have a top end ssd.
again, had you read what i said, you would know i have tested 7 on alot of hardware vs xp my findings are quite contrary to yours…
(Anyway 32 is overkill and ‘id10t’ in my eyes too)
yup, 109.99 for 32gb of 1866 ram was an id10t move, i regret it so much, that i wish i had bought a few more kits to sell to friends……
But we can’t judge you of what you have. From all the post you said, it looks like you are a reference point that everyone else here must follow… It’s not because you have a pc of 3000$, that ours are crap and idiotic…
my pc was well under 3k, and its been a slow progression, I buy as i get good deals
examples
board 74.10
ram 109.99
psu 95.00
videocards 209.99×2
cpu 189.99
cooler 64.98
case 109.99by my math thats 1064.03, and it was spent over an extended time.
progression with this board was 1055t with 8gb ddr3 1600, then 16gb ddr3 1600, then this 32gb kit, the first kit i had from a previous build(and its back in that board again) the 2nd kit was 64usd on newegg shellshocker.
I have a 2nd sabertooth 990fx i paid 109.99 for on geeks.com with my 8120(that replaced the 1055).
you seem to be under the impression that i have alot of money, i dont, but, I also am not a cheap kitten who will try and use ancient hardware to play modern games then complain they run poorly, im also not to cheap to buy technet every few years….
actually, WinXP owns Win7 in terms of gaming power. the FPS difference is game-dependent, but often a 2-digit number
i’m surprised too.thats a crock of what the kitten left in the litter box, the ONLY place I have seen any benefit to sticking to xp was on very old slow systems that really shouldnt be used for gaming today…..and even then…..if its that old, I would stick vector on it so i wouldnt have to suffer with buggy slow xp.
but Win7 owns WinXP in terms of multi-core utilization.
so, in case that you’re often running programs, which are capable of utilizing your 4 cores efficiently, Win7 is your friend.7 has a better secduler and better optimizations for modern cpu’s then xp, and note, i have 8 cores :P
anyways, i kinda miss WinXP, but i’m glad i moved on to Win7. it’s superior in many ways and not nearly as bugged as it’s predecessors.
if you miss xp UI, then grab windowblinds and use the xp theme…..I do not miss the “fisher price my first pc” luna ui at all….infact i was in the xp beta…..i was the guy who coined that phrase (in quotes) funny enough it spread after release….lol
wow…i’ve let myself getting sucked into that religious battle.
some people are stuck in the past, I have one guy I use to game with who to this day insists that if windows 98se had drivers for modern hardware he would use it because it was faster….but he also thinks it could use more then 1 core…..sooo…..LOL
Espionage.3685: interesting, I have tested 7 vs xp on a large slew of systems, and if the system has 1-1.5gb ram I have yet to find a case where 7 wasnt as fast or faster even for older games.
You need to try it on a Acer TravelMate 2480 then with 2GB of RAM (my old laptop) :p
If I can recall the specs, it had an Intel Celeron M @ 1.6GHz, 2GB (2×1GB) DDR2 RAM, Intel 950GMA.
could be you needed proper drivers not the acer ones, could also be that the celeron m like all celerons is a slow pos…but would shock me if it was slower then that duron….then again the duron did have better then intel GMA for video….
one thing to note: with laptops, it can be a chore to find all the proper drivers updated, drivermax is worth a look in those cases……
In technology, as in politics, the economy, social issues and religion, I find it best not to expose myself too often to those who are so completely right (and by extension, everyone else so completely wrong)
(edited by hoegarden.4287)
Technical support or tech support refers to a range of services by which enterprises provide assistance to users of technology products such as mobile phones, televisions, computers, software products or other electronic or mechanical goods. In general, technical support services attempt to help the user solve specific problems with a product—rather than providing training, customization, or other support services. Most companies offer technical support for the products they sell, either freely available or for a fee. Technical support may be delivered over the telephone or online by e-mail or a website or a tool where users can log a call/incident. Larger organizations frequently have internal technical support available to their staff for computer related problems. The internet is also a good source for freely available tech support, where experienced users may provide advice and assistance with problems. In addition, some fee-based service companies charge for premium technical support services.
That said;
Today me and 10 others defending a tower vs 30 sea farers, and again I couldn’t press my skills and now not even in downstate.. I had the time to vengeance but nothing happened!!! I died and the enemy laughed.
So again for the love of god and the new pope..
Will the skill lag be fixed? Will it be fixed on the next patch?
If its not, then please say that..
Remove my posts, remove my forum account please.
Worst support i have ever seen in a game. Goodbye!
I can see this as a trend for this game until issues get fixed. Too bad since GW2 has alot of potential
Too bad noone from Anet will ever read these posts.
intel 335 180gb/intel 320 160gb WD 3TB Gigabyte GTX G1 970 XFX XXX750W HAF 932
Not sure what OP’s issue is. Guardian staff has the best auto-attack! If the server is crapping its pants such that people cannot get more skills off, then guardians become OP.
the only one who reads this thread will be the one who lockes it(hi ashley) and relegates it to the “no problem here” file.
told you megatron, anet really dont care, they already got your money, and mine…….offer me a refund and i will walk away and never bother these forums again…..till then……
i will suggest people read that and consider
http://ashentech.com/index.php/topic,3103.msg20616/topicseen.html
(read first link in the first post as well)
I think ESO is gonna be my new home…..though im having fun in DC U the last few days!!!
PCP&C 1200watt TC, Crosshair V F-Z, Sapphire 290x
hey i really love your game. and im trying to do a order of whisper quest the battel of claw island but at a certain part of the quest it laggs and then i get sent back to the main screen pls. fix this i really wanna get the questline done.
hey i really love your game. but im haveing a issue every time i try to do the quest battel of claw island it starts to lag at a certain part pls. patch this or fixit just pls. do something.
hey i have a lv. 52 charr engineer and i wanna asked anet if they could maybe give the engineer more weopen options becuase i find it hard to grind better rifles so if you do a update agin i would really enjoy you adding more weapon types for the engineer