A 1v1 match would result in BG dominating every server. 9/10 times, BG’s zerg can wipe an opposing one of equal or slightly bigger number because a lot of our players are seasoned wvw players who listens to commanders when, where, and what to drop. Might, Veil, Water, Bomb, Banners. Not to mention they’re very good at positioning the group to cut through enemy zergs.
What amuses me is that people keep stating that the 2v1 is justified because BG bought guilds — as if JQ and TC did not. I guess whatever makes them feel better about the desperate 2v1 tactic.
You must have missed the last week Bg and SoS teamed up on JQ.
So basically the server with the greatest coverage wins then.
How about this, how about we split the PPT score into 3 separate scores. Midnight to 8, 8 to 4, and 4 to midnight. So basically there is a potential for 3 points per match, and none of those PPT scores interact with each other.
Basically those servers with massive coverage during Midnight to 8 are guaranteed a point for that time slot. The beauty of this is, it doesn’t guarantee them a win in the other 2 time slots. In order to win the match, a server must win at least 2 out of the 3 time slots.
More emphasis is now moved towards skill and less towards coverage. So basically those servers with little skill and lots of coverage are doomed.
Do you support that OP?
this isn’t a bad idea but would involve more work for anet.
I can no longer play anymore as well. I have not been following forum updates or anything but that does not change the fact that if we were able to play the game with Mac OS X 10.6.8 and not 10.7.5 or later it should not be changed.
