Showing Posts For BillX.4987:
~when you live with apes, man it’s hard to be clean…
~my 2 cents are: Maximize your damage output first (full zerk+condi buffs if) and note the numbers…then work it back towards ‘sustain’ (heals, condi cleanse, movement speed and endurance is a part of that) and test to satisfaction, but keep in mind the situation (your opponents and their numbers)
Part of the fun IMO is to figure it out on your own (to hell with peoples ‘labels’) and yes it takes time and money (many of us are GRAAAND MAAASTERS of ‘Smithing’ yet we are not allowed to disassemble/recycle our products) glhf
(edited by BillX.4987)
~and for the record, MY impression of ‘Meta’ is: ‘What GENERALLY works best’…and so what! As if we have INFINITE options??
~DHawk.2687, I take it you haven’t noticed in almost ALL of Amins.3710 videos he IS playing a ‘Meta’ Variant/Meditation Guardian build, yet he feels it OK to come here and dictate, well as you can see and read, just saying…
Also, you can message people on this forum or find them ‘in game’ with no need to communicate to someone indirectly through other peoples posts therefore minimizing tedious/useless literature so others MAINLY Devs (hopefully) ‘get what they come for’…not picking a fight or trying to be disrespectful, just saying…
(edited by BillX.4987)
~I feel ya, it’s happening to ALOT of people on ranged weps/attacks.
I hear it’s a terrain glitch (the ground is level I know) that’s hopefully addressed and fixed soon since I love to 1v1 in WvW…Great Vid thanx
~and Thanx Letoll.3782, spoken like a true soldier!
~and I will NOT keep my fingers crossed…
~K, I edited the OP…
~ok then, allow me to explzzzzzzzzzzzz…zzz…zzz…
~as I said: Leave it to the arrogant, liars, idiots, trolls and haters to contribute everything to allude a request to simple yes or no question…the more this drags; the more it SUPPORTS an argument…
(edited by BillX.4987)
~a request is a problem because YOU say so? Pursuing and enjoying 1v1s in WvW with people/friends is dead end because YOU say so? I suppose you feel 10v1 is a fair fight. This is a simple request and the more it drags out; the more it supports an argument. Leave it to the arrogant, liars, idiots, trolls and haters to contribute everything to allude a simple yes or no question…Or is it that I deserve to be crucified for making such a request here?
(edited by BillX.4987)
~could we just adhere to the request of the original post instead of ‘judging’ each other with speculation and ‘shouldawouldacouldas’?
If anything, consider this a ‘Community Challenge’ with the X-Guardian that provides substantial evidence of this gets PROPER bragging rites ~OR by having NO substantial evidence provides the community with insight and wisdom to what I personally feel is an unfun problem…by all means, spread the word/ask your friends
(edited by BillX.4987)
~I am told that in WvW a ‘LONE (w/e build) GUARDIAN’ is able to down a ‘PRO’ Condi(or variant)-Engi, Mes, Ele and Nec (regardless of Perplexity Runes) on 1v1 with or without map stax…
May I request a link of legitimate footage ONLY (as in with both players invested 100% and NO build to view and copy for myself) that supports this which is NOT taking place in Obsidian Sanctum from anyone?
*Please consider this a GW2 Guardian Community Challenge in which the person that produces such evidence, deserves proper ‘Bragging Rights’…(in my opinion)
(edited by BillX.4987)
…dear god take me now, this is what I get for not reading and assuming.
thanx :/
Been working at this achievement excessively on a ‘Guardian’ (Main Toon).
Have achieved ‘Exposed Weakness’ properly, but for some reason the other achievement wont resolve…
~I have made all traits 0
~utility skills are signets and not even using them
~minipet removed
~will only approach a vortex with aegis form virtue of courage >removed< and within the 40sec cooldown
~am a using a staff to ensure multiple targets destroyed within achievement timer rules
~rebooted PC and game to attempt a fresh starts…aand
…I’m lost, please help?
~fair enough, truth is I’m tired of talking about this and just updating/editing the crap out of my OP. Please feel free and read slow sentence by sentence…a dictionary may help, never fear mind expansion man
READ Iaokoko, READ LIKE THE WIIIND…
@stale.9785
~tbh, I’m really for anything that keeps trash from dumping us…
@Angel.6085
~I can’t help feel that your answering your own questions, you’ve validated the issue…
It’s as if abandoning a group one was not initially in and blocking those they rather avoid is some cardinal sin and ‘self entitlement’ should be the driving force to regulate clash of interests…
The issue is the freedom to violate a principle which is selfish, greedy, an exploit, calloused and blatantly not fair…the points are 2-0:
People against ‘Party Leader’ want TWO things> Everyone kicks anyone at their discretion AND the freedom to join any party with whatever and do so…
People that support ‘Party Leader immunity with final kick decision after party requests’ just want ONE THING> For people to read, understand and adhere to the message posted on LFG system (which we all know WILL NOT BE RESPECTED) OR for people to be unable to kick them from the party that they have initiated WHENEVER therefore attaining control of the party for WHATEVER reason…
It’s supposed to be: LFG or GLFM…not: “CHUMMING THE WATERS!”
If you threw a party/social gathering in your home and unwelcomed guests arrived be it word of mouth, lights and music, however…must I go on?
…and for the record this is not about me and making it so tells me your just another clown jerk trying to cover his butt because I’ve metaphorically called the police…
(edited by BillX.4987)
(edited by BillX.4987)
NO. Then there wouldnt be kick vote at all .
2 days ago some dude made party for some dung he said all levels. Some 40 lv joined for dungeon and he started to vote kick that 40lv. We all refused and he started to vote kick all other members, we all refused and i started vote kick for him and we kicked him out. Some other guy came and we did dungeon in 10-15 mins normally. 40 lv was gratefull after that.
~you see, that is like murder of a salesperson…and that is BS, that needs to change.
How is it proper when a person that is ‘just learning’ to play this game and the micro-minimal population shares an interest, so they initiate a LFG to find others to only be kicked because of lack of efficient performance or proper answer if questioned?? Lets flip that formula…what do you know, the same result…THIS IS MORE ABOUT THEM NOT YOU…
It is SICKENING that you people insist that your ‘self entitlement’ to be in any party you pop into is directly proportional to the entitlement with the ability of ‘logging in’…
you people probably believe you have the right to drive…
(edited by BillX.4987)
Could we get a Dev to have a say please??
‘Lets attack the Quack’ thread?…really?
I’m sure his #3 over looked our taxi system, no need to smite…
~one issue I’ve realized with ‘Party Leader’, would be 2 partial parties attempting to merge…I want to say> in which that the interested ‘Party Leader’ must ‘right click/assign as party leader/join party’ when the total of the members equates to 5 after some PMs and awkward debates…
(edited by BillX.4987)
Is a workplace in which employees fire the employer at their discretion proper or a viable business to invest in? Could you expect substantial job security and/or promotions working there?
HEEEEEELL NO!!!
(edited by BillX.4987)
~I have a hunch that perhaps part of the problem with people allowing a ‘stranger’ to manage their own group may be the connotation of the word itself, ‘Kick’…perhaps a proper term should be reviewed and implemented, may I suggest ‘Dismiss’…
(kick) GLF1M!
(edited by BillX.4987)
~all in all the true victim on this issue are the new/future customers of Anet/NCSoft…
~PUGs are the prelude to meeting/making friends and guilds…
~Anet/NCSoft has delivered amazing products but it falls on us as a community to self mitigate/delegate and we just need the proper tools to create structure…
~my personal favorite fix for alot are 2 separate servers: One for age verified uncensored content and the other for…well, what we have now, but that’s neither here or there, complicated and probably too costly (but would be soo much more fun and profitable for the company imo)…
~regardless, being idle on issues and problems is as if condoning them…
(lets just take a moment for laokoko to read his own posts)
~a tyrant without subjects, is no tyrant…
~all in all the true victim on this issue are the new/future customers of Anet/NCSoft…
~PUGs are the prelude to meeting/making friends and guilds…
~Anet/NCSoft has delivered amazing products but it falls on us as a community to self mitigate/delegate and we just need the proper tools to create structure…
~my personal favorite fix for alot are 2 separate servers: One for age verified uncensored content and the other for…well, what we have now, but that’s neither here or there, complicated and probably too costly (but would be soo much more fun and profitable for the company imo)…
~regardless, being idle on issues and problems is as if condoning them…
(edited by BillX.4987)
What would truly fix this problem? People reading and adhering to requested info in LFG. Oh and make you own kitten groups
I swear i think the only people scared of being kicked are those that are incapable of making it and terrorists.
Wow. That’s some interesting parallel universe in which you’re living there.
Did you forget to read the problem the original poster tries to solve with his suggestion?
Did you forget that you can’t fix stupid and force people to do things like read?
Did you forget that most people can’t make their own kittening group, which is WHY LFG WAS INVENTED IN THE FIRST PLACE?
~I’ll defend Don on that Kasima. He is just stating blatant facts with slight sense of humor. Please just re-read and apply yourself to understand the syntax…your both right…
(edited by BillX.4987)
The person that initiated the ‘party’ should be immune to being kicked, able to kick others non-unanimous and UNABLE to leave the ‘party’ until after a ‘right-click name/assign as party leader’ is executed (disconnects will not result in everyone being booted and next name gets the responsibility by default)…
Those that joined aforementioned party should be able to ‘right-click name/request to be kicked’ all members of said party (including the ‘initiator’) and wait for how said ‘initiator’ will respond and/or simply take the names of ‘those to be blocked/avoided’ and leave at their discretion…
To clarify- I swear i think the only people scared of being kicked as party members are those that are incapable of making it and terrorists.
You are wrong. Besides since when “terrorists” are afraid of anything? Your own statement makes no sense at all.
~he is exactly right, think about what he’s saying…
>>And if I don’t like someone for whatever reason, I want to be able to kick them. I’m very tolerant to other’s skill level, and I can be patient to teach people. But But there’s a limit of my patience for someone who isn’t listening.<<
~and there it is folks, thank you for that…
(edited by BillX.4987)
With the multitude of clown-jerks in this game, could you please exempt ‘Party Initiators’ from being kicked at the discretion of these people and allow that ‘Party Initiator’ kick at their discretion non-unanimous or at members request?
A person that initiates a group deserves/needs this authority…especially for high level FotM PUGs.
It’s BS that these people have the ability to exploit those that can unlock higher level FotM zones by joining the group (which leads to ‘excessive message’ after repetitive leavings) with or without AR, with whatever class they want, run whatever they want, play however they want and kick whoever makes a stand against them…Is this intentional Anet?
__________________________________________________________________
The person that INITIATED the ‘party’ should be immune to being kicked, able to kick others non-unanimous and UNABLE to leave the ‘party’ until after a ‘right-click name/assign as party leader’ is executed to leave (disconnects will NOT result in everyone being booted and next name gets the responsibility of ‘Party Leader’ by default)…
Those that JOINED aforementioned party should be able to ‘right-click name/request to be kicked’ all members of said party (INCLUDING the ‘initiator’) and wait for how said ‘initiator’ will respond in which they may simply right-click the names of ‘those to be blocked/avoided forever and ever’ and leave at their discretion if the decision proves undesirable…
~the entitlement of playing the game does NOT entitle us to be in any party we so choose at any given moment…
~all in all the true victim on this issue are the new/future customers of Anet/NCSoft…
~PUGs are the prelude to meeting/making friends and guilds…
~Anet/NCSoft has delivered amazing products but it falls on us as a community to self mitigate/delegate we just need the proper tools to create that structure…
~my personal favorite fix for many issues are having 2 separate servers: One for age verified uncensored content and the other for well, what we have now but that’s neither here or there, complicated and probably too costly (but would be soo much more fun and profitable for the company imo, omg could you imagine?)…
~The issue is the freedom to violate a principle which is selfish, greedy, an exploit, calloused, uncivilized and blatantly unfair…the score is a grim 2-0:
People against ‘Party Leader’ want and currently have TWO things> Everyone kicks anyone at their discretion AND the freedom to join any party with whatever and do so…
People that support ‘Party Leader immunity with final kick decision with or without party requests’ just want ONE THING> For people to read, understand and adhere to the message they have posted on LFG system (which we all know WILL NOT BE RESPECTED) when they initiate a party OR for people to be unable to kick them from the party that they have initiated WHENEVER for WHATEVER reason…
It’s supposed to be: LFG or GLFM and not: “CHUMMING THE WATERS!”
~regardless, being idle on issues and problems is as if condoning them…
(edited by BillX.4987)
~at first it saddened me that you’d ask why I would start a PUG of all questions when that’s EVERYONES prelude to making friends and guilds, but I’m actually glad you did because that’s indicative of there being an issue…
It is expected that people will join a PUG just to muck it up for their own petty amusement and/or to impress other jerks which makes me ask why there is no solid method of control for this crap at ‘betas’ when I KNOW I’m not the only person that feels this way…
(edited by BillX.4987)
With the multitude of clown-jerks in this game, could you please exempt ‘Party Leaders’ from being kicked at the discretion of these people and allow that ‘Party Leader’ kick at their discretion non-unanimous?
A person that initiates a group deserves/needs this authority…especially for high level FotM PUGs.
It’s BS that these people have the ability to exploit those that can unlock higher level FotM zones by joining the group (which leads to ‘excessive message’ after leavings) with or without AR, with whatever class they want, run whatever they want, play however they want and kick whoever makes a stand against them…Is this intentional Anet?
(edited by BillX.4987)
With the multitude of clown-jerks in this game, could you please exempt ‘Party Leaders’ from being kicked at the discretion of these people and allow that ‘Party Leader’ kick at their discretion non-unanimous?
A person that initiates a group deserves/needs this authority…especially for high level FotM PUGs.
It’s BS that these people have the ability to exploit those that can unlock higher level FotM zones by joining the group (which leads to ‘excessive message’ after repetitive leavings) with or without AR, with whatever class they want, run whatever they want, play however they want and kick whoever makes a stand against them…Is this intentional Anet?
(edited by BillX.4987)
Acquisition:
Fractals of the Mists daily reward chest
Defeating Tequatl the Sunless
Guild missions
Exotic champion loot bags
WvW Rank chests
Attained from the reward chest of killing all three Wurms in Triple Trouble.
~Thanx everyone (gosh I love this helpful and informative forum)
~FYI, ‘Laurel Merchants’ won’t hook this up….(cough)
~thanx guys, again I can’t shake the feeling that I squander for sCraPs…
~I’m not sure if I read/understood the wiki correctly but, I think it said ‘Ascended Zealot’ armor could drop from FoTM as ‘Raider’ armor, is this right?
Has anyone been ‘offered this option’ after drop??
(edited by BillX.4987)
~Due to personal matters, I have missed all of Scarlet’s ‘Twisted Marionette’ events. Is there any way to acquire ‘Ascended Keeper’s Gear Recipes’ other than the ‘BLTP’ which is currently VERY limited with the prices insulting?
~If not, will there be another chance to get them in the near future?
~Couldn’t we just ‘Discover’ ascended recipes instead?
(edited by BillX.4987)
If anything I’m challenging the ‘Devs’ to test these ‘twerks’ and take them into consideration for a Guardian rebalance after trial by fire VS the aforementioned meta-onomatopoeia…especially now that China is more involved (Yes, I respect and fear asian kids)
And I can’t help but feel the same about you with such an empty and implicative comment…
@igmolicious.5986
I actually have the same feelings, but still somehow fail to see how what your saying would make a ‘Over-Powered’ difference VS a 1 and/or all 3+: ‘perma-regen crit-tank escapist warrior’, ‘perma-stealth blind-bot condi-crit escapist thief’ and ‘perma-tele condi-crit stealth escapist mesmer’ which can and will strip boons, besides I assure you the fight(s) won’t be over after all those ‘Over-Powered’ heals and {Renewed Focus} is on CD, but will give a Guardian proper opportunity to be a better ‘escapist’ as well as was intended (please keep in mind the lack of Condi-Tank Necros, Engis and Eles in the conversation).
Perhaps I’m just burned from fighting PROs in WvW and S/TPvP and feel something is missing for Guardians to get proper kills and to NOT have to ‘conform’ to full ‘Bunker’ or ‘Paper-DPS’ to compete and I feel I should make a stand…If anything I’m challenging the ‘Devs’ to test these ‘twerks’ and take them into consideration for a Guardian rebalance after trial by fire VS the aforementioned meta-onomatopoeia…especially now that China is more involved :O (Yes, I respect and fear asian kids)
(edited by BillX.4987)