Showing Posts For Cook.9375:
Nice straw man argument here. There is actually no mention of a BOT in the original reply and no indication of the means by which this person was assessed. There is on the other hand a clear indication though there is some form of evidence for the decision. We are not privy to that, which is quite understandable, seen as we have no rights to that kind of information.
There is also a blind assumption in your post that the post referred to is by a person not involved in using bots. We only have a statement. I am not suggesting this is not a real player but how can we tell the difference?
Certainly it would be in the interest of those involved using bots to create arguments against the very system that is designed to protect people who play the game from people who abuse the game for whatever purpose.
Now, should a significant level of reports be filed for exactly the same reasons by a diverse number of players then it would raise further questions. I would therefore reserve any knee-jerk reaction your feel toward the company until there is clearer evidence on the matter to justify such a response.
Maybe it was a mistake by the company, maybe a bogus post, maybe a bot plot to destroy an effective method of getting rid of them. Fact is, we don’t know and speculation without facts is only likely to further dissatisfaction than promote enjoyment.
What we do know is that there is a perfectly appropriate response and format for escalation given to the poster concerned.