Good call.
Whoever calls this censorship must remember that the so-called freedom of speech is not a “I can say whatever I want, however I want and whenever I want” right, it has boundaries and that sub-forum was clearly trespassing most of them.
(As most forums, but this is an official gateway for Anet too, and having that sub-forum was hurting their image more than helping it. Just deal with it, and take the circlejerks elsewhere, its that simple)
Problem 1 with this statement (already mentioned, want to re-iterate): We’re not arguing they don’t have the right, we’re arguing it’s not a good idea.
Problem 2 with this statement: It’d hurt their image more if we moved to more public gaming forums in which more people that haven’t purchased the game yet existed.
I also believe that the observation that this is simply an attempt to scale down mod staff effort is correct – I think very little of the reasoning that the ANET staff presented actually had to do with what kind of moderation would be best for the players on the forum. I cannot confirm this, as I cannot read their minds, however, it seems more logical, regardless of reasoning given by them.
That being said, ANET, if you are reading this, or anyone else, if you are reading this and simply are interested in the subject, understand that it is of my belief and that of several others that this simply isn’t going to work. I think what is key to understand here is:
1) People are going to try to post matchup threads anyways. Some of them will do so intentionally because you got rid of the matchup thread as a statement. Even if they do not, they will be craftier in insulting other servers, using random opportunities on threads as general as discussing the value of zergs vs small groups, etc. Because of this, you will find that you will not lower the necessity of forum moderators as much as you think it is.
2) This is not a good trade-off. Once the matchup threads are gone from the forums, I’m gone from the forums, an awful lot of people are gone from the forums. Effectively, you are severing a major link of communication between you and your players, which, might I add, are providing the profits through gems to even have this forum active.
3) This will lower general opinions of the ANET WvW team. Perhaps one of the reasons that you are considering this action is the occasional slander of ANET staff within the forums, and how the matchup threads are popular enough that this becomes popularly viewed, and thus popularly received as opinion. The problem is that literally every server has their own community site, and sees this anyways, in even less moderated levels. By getting rid of the matchup thread, people will be more redirected to these forums, which, combined with the severance of communication, is a perfect formula for an unhappy wvw populace.
4) Most of the WvW population really, really isn’t interested in switching to less server-intensive modes such as PvE. Just in case it is within your intentions to get us out of WvW into other modes simply because WvW is relatively server-taxing and hard to sell gem-items from due to the fact that it’s supposed to be fair and isn’t about glimmer, please understand that most of us don’t like PvE, and we only do so when we have to to stay competitive in WvW. I know countless people who leveled up their characters to 80 via crafting so they wouldn’t have to PvE with them all the way to 80. If they are disgusted with the way WvW works, they won’t just go into PvE and start forking out more gems. They’re simply gone.
5) Many individuals have been disillusioned by leagues. Repealing this decision would be a very effective way of reminding them that the ANET team does indeed consider their opinions as valid and important.