Showing Posts For Naimun.1209:
push push push push
We are a completly new Guild with few members who are looking for more skilled players who not only want to complete Raids, Fractals and Dungeons but also do this as fast as possible.
To do so we have some req. aswell:
Atleast 3 of the raid classes (Druid, Berserker, Tempest, Chronomancer, Engineer, Herald or Reaper)
- Personal fractal lv should be 50+ with enough agony resistance (80+)
- Killed Vail Guardian atleast once
- Using TS3 for raids (also having a microphone to talk)
- age +18
- no rep. is required
- general knowllege of raids/fractals/dungeons and the classes you play
- Buff food and Sigils for the Dungeons and Fractals
If this looks something like you want to join send me letter ig under Naimun.1209
Well yes, that shows a banned login launcher screen. Aaaaaand?
That’s acctually the screenshot of the girl who got banned. Compare the build of the banned screen (bottom right) and the ingame build (press F11 and then look at the bottom right corner) you’ll see that those builds are exactly the same as the current build. This means that her ban occured since the last patch. (To be exact 25th August since we were there!)
Element had to post this since her account is banned and cant post it herself!
Furthermore the admins of ANET can clarify her account name seen in the background of that picture.
(edited by Naimun.1209)
I’ll go ahead and play this game. The “screenshot” you’ve provided while “awesome”, doesn’t discount the fact that no one in this screenshot has been actioned. You are posting on the forums, which is a clear indication that you are not banned. None of the people in this party chat are banned. So while the “Legit” is being put into say (according to this screenshot), no action was taken against anyone here.
I know you wanted to post a screenshot of an account being banned, but you are posting a screenshot from the launcher back in 2012. We are on build 38057 not 15377.
My guess is that the GM was putting into question the validity of the tactic being used, but did not action as there was nothing against the rules.
I’ll go ahead and supply the screenshot that the GM took in context of this text. GM Stuffs and Character Name of person in question are blurred (sorry!)
I’m not sure if I understood Chris clearly but is that the first screenshot at the top of " http://i.imgur.com/tcacZ5W.jpg " Is not the legit screenshot? And is Chris saying that there has been no action taken against the people from the top of that screenshot? As you may see from my account name I was in the party and was really confused when the host got banned suddenly… And is the screenshot provided by Chris the actual screenshot that has been taken by the Anet dev “Pans Lab” ?
http://puu.sh/ba9F8/05e8d598f0.jpg
First of all in the link i give now you can see the TS log of that day (25th August 2014) on the left and the acctuall screenshot of Alatea.2483 on the right. Furthermore i’ve marked the link of her screenshot sending it to us in TS. She got banned at 23:51 and sent us the screenshot at 23:55. Those are some mad photoshop skills imo.
Secondly i’ve quoted Lordarnoud’s message because in the screenshot you can clearly see his name (Warrior’s name) in the party Chat. (And you can see his name in our Teamspeak Channel aswell).
Thirdly in this link https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/game/dungeons/Safespots-and-Exploits/page/2#post4338224 Chris Clearly obviously states that standing OUTSIDE of the boss’s range is a bug and not an exploit.
“Standing outside a stationary boss’s range is not an exploit, the boss “should” reset after an extended period of time, but is not. This is an example of poor boss implementation, and not an exploit” (4th Paragraph)
Even if this would be considered as an exploit in this moment, she should have gotten a warning first and for the second time a temporary ban.
“I’ll be very clear here:
If a GM finds a player that is using a “Safe Spot”, that player will be moved out of the safe spot and warned (via in-game text). If they are caught again, that account will be temporarily suspended.” (7th Paragraph)
The fact that she got a perma ban for not even exploiting is highly confusing.