Showing Posts For Sky.1623:

This isn't about gear but human nature

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Sky.1623

Sky.1623

This has absolutely nothing to do with personal opinions. The issue, rather, is with the vision Anet communicated to customers. It has nothing to do with my opinion or your opinion; rather it has to do with the words of Anet when they introduced the game. Personal preference was an issue when people bought the game. It makes no sense to buy a product that aligns with your personal preferences and then find that they’ve decided to make the game conform to someone else’s personal preferences. If I buy a product that says it’s going to dye my hair blond, I’m not going to be happy with a product that dyes my hair brown. Was the decision made on personal opinion? Yes, I think my hair looks better blond. Am I justified in being upset? Yes, the product said it was going to dye my hair blond. This is straightforward, there are no questions of personal preference or opinion in the matter at hand.

I bought a product that promised to make my hair blonde. I could get more of this product whenever I wanted. The producers realize that some people aren’t happy with the shade of blonde that was received. They start seeing the numbers and mindset representative of people being ‘finished’ with their product, not buying any more of the bonus features where they were making their real money. They make a educated decision to make the product a little more brown, trying to find a place where both people can be happy.

I think if you want to be mad, be mad at the lack of transparency about the causes of this adjustment (which, fingers crossed, will be talked about in the AMA). The people who think this decision was made solely, or mostly, based of the forums are being naive.

This isn't about gear but human nature

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Sky.1623

Sky.1623

Why did you make this statement? Who was it directed at? What are you referring to?

OP is weighing his personal opinions vs what Anet did. We have access to none of the information they have. It seems dumb to ask them to change something because you don’t like the precedent when we’re not going to talk about all the positive and negative effects on the game.

This isn't about gear but human nature

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Sky.1623

Sky.1623

I think it’s odd that everyone assumes that they have the same information as Anet does. We have no idea what their numbers were like pre and post ascended gear. We do know that there was a significant group of people who were sitting around farming Orr at the expense of anything else. We do know is that a common comment on the forums was for people who didn’t feel like they had anything to do was to stop playing. That works great for the players, they don’t have to pay a subscription, so they can only come back for a few weekends a year and get their moneies worth. It makes complete sense to me that Anet doesn’t want to encourage that kind of behavior. It makes complete sense to me that adding this new tier of gear in slow batches was a measured move to combat the lack of progression that many players were feeling while hopefully not completely alienating the groups of people who are spending their time exploring the world.

I just don’t understand how everyone is so presumptuous about the facts of guildwars compared to the people who have all the numbers.

Regarding Ascended Gear, High-End Items and WvW

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Sky.1623

Sky.1623

The back and a ring are all thats coming out at first but they plan on putting an entire set out and “soon”. Also ascendent is about 8% better than a exotic.

So take it as you will, but when they put out full sets of ascendent, exotics will be nigh on worthless.

Except for their skins.

SE Path 1

in Fractals, Dungeons & Raids

Posted by: Sky.1623

Sky.1623

Did they change being able to hold one of the first wave of dudes till you get to the first boss fight? I thought path 1 was very easy. We couldn’t beat the double golem boss in path 2, though.