Showing Posts For VcatoV.7450:

ROE, Jane (a minor) v TIXX INFINIRARIUM, Inc.

in Wintersday

Posted by: VcatoV.7450

VcatoV.7450

It would be necessary, in what could be assumed to be a torrid affair with discourse, to call into question the very nature of a juridical system which attempts recompense like regimentalized keg-brawlers in a ring. Hunters after prey. Seeping and slithering through action and discourse channels to make certain nodal control over the narrative of fear. By creating a virtual world from the dubious dust of causal links, the barristers-in-agression subvert the epistemological function. One could even call into question the ontology of the creator-function (where here the creator function is differentiated from the creator so as not to place a juridical limit on the actions, behaviors, possibilities, or spontaneities of the entity described) as it relates to the products of its creation. What can be done when every act or creation is transgressive? This is certainly not to advocate a laissez-faire approach to Tixx and the subsequent conundrum, as even the act of letting each be creates certain spheres into which counter-conducts can accrue. If, in this sense, the juridical establishment at hand is attempting to equate the facts of creative productivity (with a pardonable aside to the wage-workers who grunt to labor-produce those goods) with the incident of harm and blame, then any and all who does anything will automatically be at fault for affecting another; as the stirrings of the flies around rotten flesh in Orr cause blizzards in Hoelbrak. Then again, one could also say that the incitement-to-non-action caused by recompensive fear would also affect others by virtue of volitionally closing off possible courses of action and interaction. Either way, what is clear is that the binaristic incitement-to-juridication becomes itself more damaging and dangerous to the individual inhabitants of Tyria than the singular incident at hand. If one is okay with forceful normalization, if one does not fear the tyranny of the judiciary and legislative powers of coercion, if one thinks it preferable to live in a virtual world constructed by others, at their whim and mercy, then move along as complacent dolyaks. If, however, one desires radical autonomy and individuality, if one seeks to break the chains of coercion, if one thinks that Tyria is real, is a world meant for the free and the living, then no course of action is left save destroying the courts and all who propagate such filth.