The issue here isn’t about fair or not and who’s duty it is to fight back or conquer what.
The issue is that WvWvW should be fun – people like to play. And Vizunah is not only ruining the fun, but also ruining their reputation.
Yesterday I had a lot of time and was in WvWvW from morning to evening. It took us (FS) 5-8 hours to get the better half of FSBL back and hold the garrison. Was good fun, a hard fight and during the primetime in the evening we held it and overtook VS in points.
Then you log on in the morning and see this that VS is holding ~80% again. (See Attachment)
You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to know that couldn’t magically happen because Miraculix gave them his potion and they suddenly could best us that clearly and that it’s unlikely the same people play 24h a day.
What is the result? I do not care that we have to re-conquer it, but it’s tiresome. That’s no sportmansship, they just spit in our faces.
VS seems not able to properly score when we’re in primetime, or dominate which seems their only goal. The fights in prime are great then, we win some, we loose some and it’s fun to play.
So in order to dominate, they, however they do it, with nolifers or Canadians, who cares, just nightcap everything, trying to make as many points as possible while we fight hard to get our stuff back during days – which we usually do.
The first result is that people don’t want to play WvWvW anymore if they’re matched with VS.
They kill the fun for everyone, including them, because the next result will be that they can have the whole WvW realm and no one will fight them anymore, then they can stand on the walls all day and watch the scenery.
The second result will be that they might rank first in WvW but no one will take them into account speaking of ranks, because they’ll have that traitorous “nightcapper-reputation”.
In the end they hurt the fun, WvW and their reputation.
This is even worse than the “ghost-sieges” in AoC, if anyone knows that issue, which in the long term got a banable offense for a whole guild.
