Showing Posts For mordepth.7615:
HoT Price Feedback + Base game included [merged]
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: mordepth.7615
This is bad sales techniques. Far more money and sales would be made via the following solution (prices not included but would be cheaper).
1. Standard Expansion HoT WITHOUT core game.
2. Deluxe Expansion HoT WITHOUT core game.
3. Ultimate Expansion WITHOUT core game.
option 4 for new players.
4. Any of the above options WITH core game at 50% discount.
Simple to implement and means far higher sales than there will be at this rate. Happier Player Community too.
a tick box for the core game means emailing a voucher to get the core game at 50% reduction depending on the core game pack you wish for.
and i will keep saying this. HoT with free core game is a new client altogether like factions was and nightfall. yet they expanded the game. sorry but they were also separate continents. HoT is the same continent. I ain’t stupid ANet.
HoT Price Feedback + Base game included [merged]
in Guild Wars 2: Heart of Thorns
Posted by: mordepth.7615
This is bad sales techniques. Far more money and sales would be made via the following solution (prices not included but would be cheaper).
1. Standard Expansion HoT WITHOUT core game.
2. Deluxe Expansion HoT WITHOUT core game.
3. Ultimate Expansion WITHOUT core game.
option 4 for new players.
4. Any of the above options WITH core game at 50% discount.
Simple to implement and means far higher sales than there will be at this rate. Happier Player Community too.
a tick box for the core game means emailing a voucher to get the core game at 50% reduction depending on the core game pack you wish for.
HoT is not going to change anything, all it does is try to cure the symptoms rather than the cause.
The problem with your argument is you have systematically ignored the main aspect of HoT which is this
STORY LINE CONTINUATION.
To say that this will not change anything means you have neither the knowledge of the lore nor the first game and history and obviously the fact you have ignored the whole story all together where there are SIX and I repeat, SIX dragons of which one is defeated on the original game BEFORE any expansion leaving a further five yes, FIVE dragons to contend with. This fact alone means the story MUST continue regardless or there is no real END GAME meaning no real END TO THE STORY.
This means your argument is negated by your very own post which is dis-information by the very definition to start with. This means any reader need not continue past this first line to read the rest of your post in reality and therefore any reading past your post is pointless and a waste of time unfortunately. This I am sure was not your intention.
Such lines are said by people who do not realise what it is they say which is actually a lot. It means you have not been paying attention to the story nor season 1 of the living story nor season 2 which leads up to where we are today with the expansion. Nor does it take into account any lore of mentioned characters, like Vekk and Oola and the golems and their labs we see in GW2 and why the Asura even came out from under the ground to take Ratasum, (Mursaat) in the first place and even why destroyers are even mentioned in GW1. (Genius Operated Living Enchanted Manifestation/s). Or why Ogden is the last remaining dwarf turning to stone. The point is this: Alot of work has already gone into GW2 to correspond with existing lore and history etc. and the fact we even see Glint in GW1 all has meaning as to the expansions we will get for GW2. I would rather see expansions than new game clients that link as in GW1 not including EotN expansion (obviously). Therefore the argument which you base your points on are mute at best. It shows a lack of knowledge and game play as in involvement in READING the games PS line alone without the rest that has taken place.
This means to ask the question then, (since your argument is baseless and mute at best), cure what symptoms?
Please do not think I am trying to flame but I am rather just pointing out the error in your post. With ALL the information can we make informed decisions but without ALL information we have no basis to argue properly and adequately.