Showing Posts For radamanthe.4706:
Be useful, point people to the underwater thread WITH an official answer. Without it, then there have to be as many underwater threads as needed. Period.
Not that I really care about some legends skill-less underwater… it may be by design, I’m ok with it. The problem is that there is only 1 double-stance setup for both land & water.
This is quite annoying because if, for example, you use dwarf/assassin stances on land, when you go under water, the setup remains dwarf/assassin. Dwarf have no water skills, so you have to select another stance. This is especially annoying because you often realize it during combat, when you swap stance. Sudenly, you have absolutely no heal + utility + elite… + you have to wait ~10 to be able to swap again.
What’s missing here is a mechanic similar to the ranger pets: 1 duo setup for land, 1 duo setup for water.
I wish AN to be less hidebound in that specific case. This lack of UI feedback never made sense anyway and I don’t want to install 3rd party stuff to have it.
Still bugged and they’ve put in an invisible wall so you can’t jump from above anymore >.>
The invisible wall above the fence directly facing the gate has always been there. But you can jump from the right where there is no fence.
Still bugged… since release… many years…
On top of all this is still player preference. Not everyone wants a single right-click to perform default actions. This is why we’re adding a toggle for it in the next patch.
Can’t wait to click that toggle to get rid of my primary concern about GW2. Thanks in advance.
+1
I just want that done now, so I vote.
Frankly there are very few things I disagree with Anet, but this one makes me crazy sometimes. The targetting system is critical and should not have flaws like that. Just make it an option and everybody’s happy !
I don’t know what lead ArenaNet to think that damaging a monster which cannot reach you is tactically unacceptable. I don’t want to know, I just won’t agree with that. Same for the advantage of being on a hill or something. Period.
The fact is that this intentional behavior as it is actually is one of the worst implementation of that kind of anti-abuse-whatever stuffs ever. Are you aware how much it can be frustrating sometimes ?
Now please : continue on not talking about it if you wish. Keep silent… but fix it ! Make it a minimum consistent… or simply remove it. It happens too frequently to be ignored. I know it is not the lack of time, it’s just a matter of removing few lines of code dedicated to spoil the fun.
Appart from that heresy… great game !